Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Natalie Miller (aka Verge): per her sources, Panthers moved up to #1 to take Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Panthro said:

I can corroborate the Bryce Young info @Vergeposted. The move to 1 was for Young. That said they do like Stroud and AR and were prepped to take AR if they moved to 3 if they couldn't pckg it to move up again. 

If Houston really loves BY they'll have to pay.  

 

So I need to start coping that the pick will be young........gods give me the strength......

Are you sure this isnt a ruse or they are testing the leaky people within the walls??

 

tumblr_n4elu2gwq11s3tym8o2_250.gif.81123931b9441669279b0dae21aaf341.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Young makes it big whether it’s here or not.  Opens the door for the little guy for years to come.  Nothing wrong with that.  
 

I have wondered before what Flutie would have done if a team stuck with him in the NFL.  He had an incredible football career regardless.

Young is way better IMO though

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Panthro said:

I can corroborate the Bryce Young info @Vergeposted. The move to 1 was for Young. That said they do like Stroud and AR and were prepped to take AR if they moved to 3 if they couldn't pckg it to move up again. 

If Houston really loves BY they'll have to pay.  

 

If he is the pick I worry more about him finishing every season on IR than his ability at qb. I've always thought he's the best prepared of the class for the past 2 season's. I do not think he will be the best of the class long term in the nfl. I have concerns about the others as well but not so much about their chances of finishing a season. 

This success of taking Young will come down to him staying off IR for 17 games and through the playoffs.  That is a huge gamble even if he's a great qb. His injury risk is much higher than the other qb's at this level I don't care what any of you say. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If he is the pick I worry more about him finishing every season on IR than his ability at qb. I've always thought he's the best prepared of the class for the past 2 season's. I do not think he will be the best of the class long term in the nfl. I have concerns about the others as well but not so much about their chances of finishing a season. 

This success of taking Young will come down to him staying off IR for 17 games and through the playoffs.  That is a huge gamble even if he's a great qb. His injury risk is much higher than the other qb's at this level I don't care what any of you say. 

I put panthro in the same spot as verge, both have called moves before they happened. 

Add in the david carr stuff, its past time to start listen.....no matter the amount of peanut butter i forced into my ear tunnel..

 

theres still time, but too much to get the sand hole started... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Everyone knows this…it doesn’t discount what he did for me.  It isn’t impossible for a small QB to be great given the chance.  He also played a long time.  

Well at least he isn't Drew Brees. All you guys that have been spamming his name the last few weeks to boost the case for your favorite prospect should be ashamed of yourselves.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Well at least he isn't Drew Brees. All you guys that have been spamming his name the last few weeks to boost the case for your favorite prospect should be ashamed of yourselves.

If you believe Stroud is the better player I am completely fine with that.  On certain days I feel the same.  It’s a great problem to have picking at #1.  We all pine for our guy.  Good stuff.

I have liked Young for a while now but I haven’t down played Stroud very much.  I do think he played from a clean pocket a lot and had incredible receiving options but he did deliver.  He is a top level prospect and I won’t deny that.

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If you believe Stroud is the better player I am completely fine with that.  On certain days I feel the same.  It’s a great problem to have picking at #1.  We all pine for our guy.  Good stuff.

I have liked Young for a while now but I haven’t down played Stroud very much.  I do think he played from a clean pocket a lot and had incredible receiving options but he did deliver.  He is a top level prospect and I won’t deny that.

Good stuff.

Stroud/Young or Richardson I'll accept and hope for the future with any of those QB's as the pick.

Game Of Thrones Drinking GIF by Sky

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...