Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moneyball is here


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

none of these deals will become crippling, thats a key point. Most are of the two year easy 3rd year out type too. 

 

None are Charles Johnson 5 year 72 million either.

 

Shaq took a pay cut.

 

Boz was the best signing in the whole NFL. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 7
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Varking said:

It’s not next level analytics lol. There aren’t game breaker offensive players on the market worth spending the money on. 

That’s what analytics is about finding value where others see a JAG. Time will tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also something to be said for *not* having a true #1 WR imho. You've still got to have some talented guys, but I think an offense is more dangerous when the distribution is very diverse. Things are less predictable and it makes it more challenging for defenses to key in on favored targets when the ball could go anywhere on any play without that traditional focal point. Of course you've got to have a QB with a quick processor and an accurate arm. Hmm...

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnluckyforSome said:

Isn't he awful in everything?

This is actually when he was good, his peak was Wolfe of Wall Street. Been down Hill (pun intended) since he lost weight and adopted his weird fashion style

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RJK said:

Other than Superbad and wolf of Wall Street, yes. 

What about that gun runner movie, he was ok in it. 

Ive never seen wall street, i heard he took that film for like 25k in order to just be a part of it (leo&martin)

jump street 21/22 he wasnt too bad. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...