Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Coach. New QB. New Uniforms?


Whoops
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, rodeo said:

Cam got fined for wearing an Underarmor chin strap years ago and now you want us to have Underarmor helmets

I hope this is sarcasm:) some of you guys are too much so who knows …but I literally just took a plain black helmet off google.

Edited by panthersphan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2023 at 1:00 AM, panthersphan said:

I’m not the best at Photoshop… but what about something like this?

 

I always felt the One Carolina logo was actually pretty great and heavily under utilized. I remember Tepper had this on the fan survey a few years back about the mid-field logo, so Tepper must like this logo. Gives us a more throwback logo but also includes both states in a pretty unique yet subtle way.

740DA679-4457-4759-9568-B9588F3FAD1B.png

not to toot my own Jaycee Horn, but I think these are nice

 

:::toot toot:::

Edited by panthersphan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

 

This is the right approach. Simple, clean up the dated look without reinventing the wheel.

If they can figure out a way to blend the logo more into the helmet without the white outline, we're in business. Minor, minor modernizing/rounding/shading of the logo to melt into the helmet is all that's needed. 

This combo, plus a white on white combo and a blue/white & blue/black combo and all is good. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm anxious to see what they look like and i thnk it's probably going to happen, but i don't have any clue whatsoever what they should look like.

i do know that the ideas that have been thrown around in this thread have me less than enthused lol. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true.
    • Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep.  If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it.  But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack.  If we could swing it, we should do it.  I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH).
    • Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons.  But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc…  but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...