Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King: Panthers have no interest in trading #1 pick

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Moorgan Enthusiast

Moorgan

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Sheena was on pat mcafee show today saying she doesn’t think the panthers know who they are taking yet. 

I think that’s probably true. They won’t “decide anything until after all 30 visits are complete. They have zero reason to commit to anything yet. Is there a front runner? Probably. Are some of the staff split? Probably. The decision makers don’t have to make the decision yet…so they won’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

To think Ohio State wanted our guys Corral and STROUD in their QB room and soon we'll have them both.

Jim Carey Reaction GIF

 

Not if someone comes along willing to offer a moldy ham sandwich for Corral.

Stroud isn't even on the roster right now and according to most isn't in the catbird seat to be our pick at #1 and he might still be more likely to be on our roster this year than Corral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not if someone comes along willing to offer a moldy ham sandwich for Corral.

Stroud isn't even on the roster right now and according to most isn't in the catbird seat to be our pick at #1 and he might still be more likely to be on our roster this year than Corral.

Says you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, therealmjl said:

Sources please?

Who Will Be The First Pick In The 2023 NFL Draft?

Curt Popejoy Draft Wire
March 27, 2023 2:59 pm ET

The 2023 NFL draft is just a month away and the Carolina Panthers are on the clock. At this point, it feels like a foregone conclusion the Panthers will draft one of the top quarterbacks but don’t think for one second if a good enough offer comes along, Carolina won’t take it.

If the Panthers stay put, Ohio State quarterback C.J. Stroud makes the most sense. He’s the most NFL-ready of this group and his measurables are elite. But if the Panthers chose to trade down a spot or two, all bets are off for that top pick.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KatsAzz said:

Who Will Be The First Pick In The 2023 NFL Draft?

Curt Popejoy Draft Wire
March 27, 2023 2:59 pm ET

The 2023 NFL draft is just a month away and the Carolina Panthers are on the clock. At this point, it feels like a foregone conclusion the Panthers will draft one of the top quarterbacks but don’t think for one second if a good enough offer comes along, Carolina won’t take it.

If the Panthers stay put, Ohio State quarterback C.J. Stroud makes the most sense. He’s the most NFL-ready of this group and his measurables are elite. But if the Panthers chose to trade down a spot or two, all bets are off for that top pick.

Exactly, we're NOT picking the smallest QB among this whole class.

THAT'S the bluff. Somebody tell @LinvilleGorge he thinks we're drafting Webster at #1.

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

If I was a betting man I'd clean up on Young dropping behind Levis and maybe even Richardson.

Skipping weigh ins, not throwing alongside the others?! That doesn't sound like the mentality of an NFL QB.

I smell lovely pink flaps.

Do you ever get tired of having the worst QB takes on the Huddle? 😂

Judging by how loud and proud you are of them, that's a resounding no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I don´t think they are going to trade it away. I am sure they are set on their guy. 

I think they all have had their minds set on someone since the combine.

It's just that they don't all have the same name in mind, but they are all sure that you can't go wrong here and that the move to #1 was the ONLY way to be sure to get the guy they all will want when they come to a consensus.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...