Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person presents: Panthers 7-round mock draft spectacular


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

So far.......

Yeah, I expect Fitterer to trade back after our 3rd round pick...maybe sooner if the board falls a certain way. I'd expect him to pick up at least a couple more picks. I'd be hard-pressed to pass on LaPorta in the 3rd, but he could probably be had later if we can get an additional pick there.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

Yeah, I expect Fitterer to trade back after our 3rd round pick...maybe sooner if the board falls a certain way. I'd expect him to pick up at least a couple more picks. I'd be hard-pressed to pass on LaPorta in the 3rd, but he could probably be had later if we can get an additional pick there.

Pick 39 seems to be the optimal pick to trade back to get an extra 3rd or 4th, where you can still find possible starters and quality depth

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, backINblack28 said:

he followed up posting this on twitter with saying that the scouts he talked to didn't love the depth at EDGE--doesn't mean we wouldn't pick it with 39 if the right player was there, but I don't mind this otherwise

I hope we are still looking at Edge in FA

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

Two corners? No edge or Oline depth? Person fails again.

I guarantee you we're not leaving the draft with all the holes on the roster filled. Very few teams will.

Edited by Rags
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...