Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young VS Stroud, the greatest Panthers debate ever?


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Icege said:

I know a lot of folks like to hold on to their trauma from previous ones, but every new regime (or romance? 👀) doesn't need to be held accountable for the previous one.

Very true. I remember sitting at a dinner with a lady who felt otherwise though.

Had some rather uncomfortable moments where I wasn't certain whether she wanted to jump my bones or stab me through the heart 😳

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Meh, of course fans are going to respond to having the #1 pick by rehashing the same tired arguments for their favorite selection in countless threads for months on end.  Yeah, that's a drag, but it is also temporary and will be soon forgotten.

Don't miss the forest for the trees. 

Managing the Digital Health Forest - Standards and Interoperability Lab -  Asia

TL/DR:  Celebrate that the Panthers have finally made a bold move to end the team's long relationship with mediocrity.

Except I saw the trade as a mistake so. . .

Like I said, I'll be glad when this is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Icege said:

All of this.

I know a lot of folks like to hold on to their trauma from previous ones, but every new regime (or romance? 👀) doesn't need to be held accountable for the previous one.

But 1995!!!!!

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Two men enter, one man leaves. Thunderdome would have been a better choice of meme

tina turner auntie entity GIF

But.....if the bigger one (thats stroud) is master blaster that means young is the Max Rockatansky.......id say the highlander is better being Im a stroud stan...

Plus does that mean Nicole Tepper is auntie entity??? @TheSpecialJuan got any pics of nicoles bare legs?!?!?!?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

But.....if the bigger one (thats stroud) is master blaster that means young is the Max Rockatansky.......id say the highlander is better being Im a stroud stan...

Plus does that mean Nicole Tepper is auntie entity??? @TheSpecialJuan got any pics of nicoles bare legs?!?!?!?

lol

Levis is probably Blaster. But in your scenario, Young would be Max since he's the one being praised the most for being smart.

Stroud could be mad max GIF

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean at the end of the day all of this debate means there's a good chance all these fluff pieces about how the trade went down are going to be Exhibit A in the court of public opinion when Young / Stroud busts.

There isn't a consensus QB1 in this Draft and we were mental to give up so much for the pick. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

lol

Levis is probably Blaster. But in your scenario, Young would be Max since he's the one being praised the most for being smart.

Stroud could be mad max GIF

Make Ahlers the jedediah and we got a blockbuster on our hands...

download.jpg.59a47488bc482ea5cb03deb761ec5d56.jpg

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I mean at the end of the day all of this debate means there's a good chance all these fluff pieces about how the trade went down are going to be Exhibit A in the court of public opinion when Young / Stroud busts.

There isn't a consensus QB1 in this Draft and we were mental to give up so much for the pick. 

 

Id be lying if id say all this young fluff talk didnt effect my stroud allegiance....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...