Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Behind the scenes in the front office


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, ECHornet said:

I don't feel like we traded away our future. It feels like we invested in our future (acquiring a franchise QB) without giving up too much. The 2025 1st will hit when we're potentially one or two pieces away. We have a lot of our future locked up or looking good right now.

We gave up two first round picks, two second round picks and our WR1.

Y'all wouldn't shut the fug up about trading a second round pick for Darnold. C'mon now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

We gave up two first round picks, two second round picks and our WR1.

Y'all wouldn't shut the fug up about trading a second round pick for Darnold. C'mon now. 

Only one first rounder really since we got the #1 in return.

That, plus one of the second rounders we gave up was an extra.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

We gave up two first round picks, two second round picks and our WR1.

Y'all wouldn't shut the fug up about trading a second round pick for Darnold. C'mon now. 

The Darnold trade wasn’t the worst. Picking up the 5th year option before the draft was terrible. Passing on Fields because we have Darnold was pretty bad too, but that’s debatable since we got Horn and Fields still needs to develop more as a passer.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

We gave up two first round picks, two second round picks and our WR1.

Y'all wouldn't shut the fug up about trading a second round pick for Darnold. C'mon now. 

If we find a franchise QB, adding the 2025 1st to the package we gave up would still easily be worth it. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2023 at 8:48 AM, CarolinaRideorDie said:

I think this article shows how much this front office was actually handicapped by Rhule. It very much does feel like Fitterer was Rhule's yes man. Now that Rhule is gone, Fitt can really work his magic and results have been pretty good so far. I have the utmost confidence in this new staff even compared to previous successful regimes. 

This was exactly what I thought. 

It also says a lot that Fitt didnt immediately try to grab all the power back himself as an over reaction. Fitt is going to be a good GM for us but ultimately his value will be earned these next 3 years as we try to compensate with out those high draft pics. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great write up.

This is the first time in my life that I've felt pretty good about the trajectory of the Panthers.

We really seem to be building a team, and not just the 53 man roster.  Like how an owner should build a team if they didn't know what they were doing.  Not pointing any fingers here.....

Overpay for some of the very best Front Office personnel, who all have a relationship or get along well with each other. 

Trust them to select your coaching staff...once again, overpay.

Sit in your box 8 Sunday's per year, and another billionaires box the other 9.  Then, hope you get to sit in your box once again for the 9th home game that season, and possibly a 10th.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2023 at 12:33 PM, *FreeFua* said:

With the FO having done their QB evaluations prior to Reich and his staff arriving I’d assume they (the FO portion of this equation) moved up with the intention of taking Bryce. Peter King mentioned yesterday that McCown really liked Young as well. 

I still believe Vegas knows best and the odds are so in favor of Stroud that I have a hard time believing we end up with Bryce. It would have to be Reich that’s really driving the Stroud bus but King mentioned yesterday that Reich would go whichever way the majority did…

So I dunno

You bring up a good point about Vegas.  (Understand that I do not gamble so I have little knowledge of the meaning of odds--this is my perspective)----Vegas odds about public decision making--such as an election--are pretty accurate because the same group of people who are betting are influencing the outcome.  However, the odds represent public opinion--and how the bets are going--not reflective of an anticipated outcome to be determined by a third party.  Their job is to make money, not predict the future, in other words--the way I understand it.  Is the public opinion wrong on this one?  In this case, the people betting are not those influencing the outcome, but they are speculating on what the Panthers' front office will do.

Sharp football Analysis says this: "Stroud (QB, Ohio State) is predicted to be drafted #1 in the 2023 NFL Draft, with a 77.78% implied probability (-350)" 

Basically more than 3 of 4 bettors are going with Stroud.  Do I interpret that right?  Not a gambler, so I am assuming that is what is meant here.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...