Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams charlotte observer Mock draft Apr 10


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

First round: No. 1 pick

▪ Name: Bryce Young

▪ Position: QB

For a second consecutive mock draft, I have the Panthers selecting Young. He was the best quarterback in college football, and the evaluation process validated that. 

There has been a lot made about new head coach Frank Reich’s history with taller quarterbacks. He has never started a quarterback under 6 foot 3 (Phillip Rivers, Andrew Luck, Carson Wentz, Nick Foles and Matt Ryan). But Reich did not draft any of those quarterbacks. Reich also shared that he had a high draft grade on Russell Wilson in 2012. General manager Scott Fitterer was the Seahawks’ director of college scouting when Seattle selected Wilson. 

History aside, Young is the best quarterback prospect available. He’ll thrive within any offense the Panthers install as long as he is protected by an elite offensive line.
 

Second round: No. 39 pick

▪ Name: Darnell Washington

Position: TE

▪ School: Georgia 

Darnell Washington has a varying range of outcomes according to several mock drafts or draft simulators. If he’s available at No. 39then the Panthers should take a chance on the 6-foot-7 tight end. 

Washington is an in-line tight end with extraordinary size and length. He’d become an instant red-zone threat and provide the next Panthers quarterback with a favorable catch radius. Washington is a straight-line runner who quickly builds speed. At only 21 years old, there is a chance he could improve his short-area quickness to become a more complete route runner. 

There are other names to watch at No. 39. Jordan Addison (USC), Jaxon Smith-Njigba (Ohio State) and Zay Flowers (Boston College) are all expected to be drafted in the first round but would benefit Carolina if any were to fall.

There should also be a surplus of pass-rushing talent available at pick No. 39. Mazi Smith (Michigan), Tuli Tuipulotu (USC), Derick Hall (Auburn), Bryan Bresee (Clemson), Will McDonald (Iowa State), B.J. Ojulari (LSU), Fleix Anudike-Uzomah (Kansas State) and Adetomiwa Adebawore (Northwestern) all have Round 2 or 3 grades according to multiple NFL evaluators.

Finding a play-making pass catcher, or a starting defensive lineman is critical at No. 39. 
 

 

Third round: No. 93 pick

▪ Name: Chandler Zavala

▪ Position: G

▪ School: NC State

 

This is the first mock draft where I’ve had the Panthers draft an offensive lineman. There are a few reasons why. First, it’s important to build upon roster strengths, especially up front. Second, the Panthers’ interior options are not necessarily deep. Guard Austin Corbett is recovering from a Week 18 ACL injury. Brady Christensen is a capable inside protector, but the team also needs a swing tackle. It’s also unclear whether Cade Mays is a future starter or a career backup. 

Reuniting Zavala with former Wolfpack teammate Ikem Ekwonu would equip Carolina with another upside option across the offensive line. Like a defensive back or pass rusher, a team can never have too many talented offensive linemen. 

Zavala played just five games in 2021 due to a back injury but was fully healthy in 2022. He played the entire season without allowing a sack and only one quarterback hit, according to Pro Football Focus. He’s capable of playing either guard or tackle.

 

Fourth round: No. 114 pick

▪ Name: Jayden Reed

▪ Position: WR

School: Michigan State

Michigan State receiver Jayden Reed falling to pick No. 114 would help the Panthers. Reed is built like a complete receiver. At 6 feet, 185 pounds, he plays bigger than his frame. Reed can play outside or in the slot. He’s explosive in short-yardage situations and uses his quick-twitch athleticism to open on underneath routes. 

Reed would likely compete with Laviska Sheneult Jr. and Shi Smith for a backup receiver role, but the Panthers need to draft and develop pass-catching talent after trading DJ Moore.

 

Fourth round: No. 132 pick

Name: Zach Evans

▪ Position: RB

School: Ole Miss

The Panthers signed running back Miles Sanders to a lucrative free agent deal, but Carolina still lacks size at the position. It’s unclear how Reich and the new coaching staff feel about incumbent running backs Chubba Hubbard and Raheem Blackshear. Drafting a running back would not be an endorsement for either. 

Evans uses his 6-foot, 215-pound frame to punish defenders. He’s a proven short-yardage runner who can also pop explosive plays. The Rebels also routinely trusted Evans in pass protection.

Coming out of high school, Evans was the No. 2 running back prospect behind Texas running back Bijan Robinson.

Fifth round: No. 145 pick

▪ Name: Carrington Valentine

Position: CB

▪ School: Kentucky 

Carrington Valentine spent the past two seasons stifling SEC receivers. According to Pro Football Focus he forced 14 pass defections and had one interception. He’s an involved run defender with 108 tackles, 80 of which were solo. His 6-foot, 190-pound frame is favorable against larger NFL pass catchers. 

Panthers cornerback Donte Jackson is recovering from a Week 10 Achilles tear and backup Keith Taylor did not perform well during an increased role last season. 

As a former wide receiver, Valentine displayed astute ball skills for a defensive back.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could live with this.  No Edge seems like a question mark, since this class is that deep but overall, it hits many of our needs.  Washington at 39 seems like a Richardson selection for TE's.  I like the IOL selection.

Edited by bythenbrs
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s pretty good 

I trust the coaching staff

…even if the pick  is AR.    It’s their jobs and reputations at stake 

Stating the obvious, one thing is certain, Bryce isn’t Cam   Gotta continually beef up that oline and backups

given the serious injuries and.surgeries to the starting Gs, taking that young guard is smart 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPF4LIFE said:

"As long as he is protected by an elite offensive line". That hasnt been the case here in a long time, and every QB since tepper got here has been injured. 

Yeah it's pure hopium at this point. But I damn sure would love to see it work out that way.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, frankw said:

Yeah it's pure hopium at this point. But I damn sure would love to see it work out that way.

I wouldnt call the line elite at all and 2 starters wont even be ready to start the season and its up in the air if they will even be the same players when they come back. Better hope it works out that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...