Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on Panthers #1 pick (no trade back)


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

The only part of this that doesn't make a ton of sense is why we were willing to go to #3 if we wanted Young all along. He was never gonna be at #3...

But these are dynamic situations and perhaps they didn't expect an opportunity to get the first QB on the board until it turned out the costs were nearly the same...

I think Frank may of really been ok with Richardson or Stroud at that point and I bet he is still banging the drum for either of those 2. I think he likes Young but when he involuntarily mentioned  Youngs durability, he showed his hand in how he feels about him.  Then you have  Schefter going full blown Young and they have the same agency. This is far from done. Young could very well be the pick but I feel there is some resistance within our contingent. 

Edited by Lurk21
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BriceYung9 said:

I’m all for it the more time passes and the more I see stuff about BY the more I know I was right all along in not buying into the floor of Stroud. Shoot for the stars and get the best QB in the draft not the most potential or safest pick the best ALL AROUND QB.

exactly.

CJ Stroud is Kirk Cousins 

Bryce Young could be Drew Brees 

you take that chance 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lurk21 said:

I think Frank may of really been ok with Richardson or Stroud at that point and I bet he is still banging the drum for either of those 2. I think he likes Young but when he involuntarily mentioned  Youngs durability, he showed his hand in how he feels about him.  Then you have  Schefter going full blown Young and they have the same agency. This is far from done. Young could very well be the pick but I feel there is some resistance within our contingent. 

He also glowingly talked about Young at the combine press conference and then at that random press conference we had a month ago. More so than the other QBs.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Now that we know Bryce Young is likely the pick.

 

Can we get this dude a legit young weapon to grow with?

 

No disrespect to Thielen he's aging, and Chark is on a 1yr deal with a injury prone history.

 

If we can get a young WR or TE he can grow with would be nice.

Adding another young WR in this draft should be a top priority regardless. All of them except Thielen have a recent injury history and he's 33. QB/WR combo please. And add OL depth.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Adding another young WR in this draft should be a top priority regardless. All of them except Thielen have a recent injury history and he's 33. QB/WR combo please. And add OL depth.

I still hope this is all speculation and Fitterer stays true to his word that they're not going to discuss the QB until they all come together next week.

With regards to an extra weapon - fug that, if they're going to risk their careers with Young you need to build an absolute wall in front of him. Dude does not handle pressure from NFL athletes well AT ALL. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Adding another young WR in this draft should be a top priority regardless. All of them except Thielen have a recent injury history and he's 33. QB/WR combo please. And add OL depth.

Oline, yes. WR? Depends on if a better pass catching TE is available. Take the better playmaker regardless of if he plays WR or TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don’t even need 1b because Tepper is the only one foolish enough to wheel that deal.    Player wise? Jake’s elbow. JR and Pep getting sideways, no Carruth, Cam’s shoulder, Luke’s concussions, it would be a long list of stuff. You can take it down to certain plays in games. Fox chasing 2 point conversions in the SB would be on my list. RMJr slipping at the end of that same game was not helpful. 
    • Ultimately this just amounts to heavy revisionist history. I mean you aren't talking to someone that just popped out the womb a week ago. I was here all throughout the predraft process. The overwhelming majority of the fanbase felt like this was a fine situation and the best situation for a rookie QB to go to compared to Houston for example. The hype for Young and our "rockstar" staff was off the charts. No one could dare speak cautious skepticism of his abilities or they would be neg repped into oblivion. Only after he had one of statistical worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years did we get this narrative now that his rookie season actually shouldn't count. Complete malarkey if you ask me.
    • On the field? Since I guess it qualifies as multiple instances it might not count, but have the damn refs throw some flags on illegal hits to Cam's head in SB50. If that doesn't count, 1A. Cotchery caught it 1B. Kasey keeps that kickoff inbounds. Off the field? 1A. Team is sold to anyone but Tepper 1B. We have the patience not to mortgage the franchise on that Bryce trade. Stroudwpuldve been the better pick but he's not worth it either.
×
×
  • Create New...