Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer, Morgan, and the Brass having pressers tomorrow?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He will give a BS answer "We are comfortable with the feedback we received from teams as to where Young will be picked and didn't want to waste anyone else's time."  You know the usual...

If it is Young and essentially has been since the combine, that is exactly what we did to CJ and Levis today.   We wasted their time.

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

they know. they've known for a while. like i said before, they've been doing due diligence and digging in to see if there is any real reason to not draft him or someone else who is a better option, but in their heads they've known. individually they've known but they just aren't saying for sure, but they said it's getting easier to tell what the other is thinking and they are on the same page.

people can deny this and tap the brakes on it all they want...but they know what they are doing and who they are picking.

I definitely think they have ideas, but when they say the final decision isn't made I don't think they're lying.

When they say they didn't want to contaminate the process by settling on a certain player too early, it makes a load of sense. Mentioned before that Shanahan and Lynch did the same thing in San Francisco when they took Lance.

(I just really hope we make a better decision than they did)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

they know. they've known for a while. like i said before, they've been doing due diligence and digging in to see if there is any real reason to not draft him or someone else who is a better option, but in their heads they've known. individually they've known but they just aren't saying for sure, but they said it's getting easier to tell what the other is thinking and they are on the same page.

people can deny this and tap the brakes on it all they want...but they know what they are doing and who they are picking.

They've known since they got in contact to try and make the move before the combine.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Sheena did asked a question about that.. But I guess they are with Frank, Thomas and the rest of the offensive staff..

I know there had been word that Levis at least was scheduled earlier and then had to be rescheduled for some reason.

Might be true of Stroud as well. Don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think they've told anybody because I don't think the pick is made yet. They've repeated multiple times that it isn't.

"Leaning" maybe, but nothing definitive.

If they stay put at #1 it's probably pretty definitive at this point who they are taking, regardless of what they are saying.

Now the part that might still be debatable, is what would it take to move off of that #1 pick.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So what about their sign is not compliant or causing the issue according to the rules? Them always having it, or the amount of time they have had it, or their loyalty to the team is not relevant to this situation. To be clear, I know next to nothing about this situation, just trying to clarify.  I have no dog in this fight and am emotionless on this topic. If you are breaking a rule, you do not get special treatment just because you have been here breaking it a long time.
    • The team fell for that late season averageness he displayed last year and got burned. You want to do that again? I don’t.  But I sort of do agree that we are stuck with him as the starter.  I can’t decide whether replacing him gets us into the playoffs so suffering through one last season is the price for freedom in 2026.  Three ways to be free in 2026: He actually plays like a real NFL QB,  The team sends him packing. Be completely out on tne Panthers until changes are made. 
    • Short version = these people have had those seats since the beginning and haven't missed a game. They have always had their sign. They had to change the sign - I think in 2015 when Cam ripped that Packers fan's banner down (love him for that, by the way) - to be compliant and haven't had any issues in the last 10 years. The Panthers even used a photo of them and their sign in their album from the Falcons game. In the 3rd quarter last weekend it was decided that the sign needed to come down. Seems weird and unnecessary, especially since it has been there for every game for a decade.   EDIT: they've had it since 2003. Still a long-ass time.... Also "cringe" is a funny word for someone over the age of 18 who lives and overshares on the Huddle. But, ok....
×
×
  • Create New...