Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young scored 98 out of 99 on his S2 cognitive test


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

I have a feeling Stoud's score isn't being leaked so it won't hurt his draft stock. I have a feeling his agent went around pleading with teams to withhold that info until after the draft. The fact it isn't being leaked means he must have posted a very mediocre or bad S2 score.

Teams already know his score.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I have a feeling Stoud's score isn't being leaked so it won't hurt his draft stock. I have a feeling his agent went around pleading with teams to withhold that info until after the draft. The fact it isn't being leaked means he must have posted a very mediocre or bad S2 score.


If teams know, then it will hurt his draft stock. At this point it’s just about keeping it from the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Should have gotten a perfect score since he's been taking it since high-school, am I right?

Billy Marshal hosted the co-owner of S2 and he said practicing doesn't improve your score to a great degree. Studies with top athletes at several schools who take the test from high school to their senior year in college only see roughly ~5 point difference even taking it for years.

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Should have gotten a perfect score since he's been taking it since high-school, am I right?

Thats definitely not how it works.  They had the guys who created it on The Roar podcast and they specifically asked them questions about stuff like that.  They said people could improve their score but their are definitely limits.  They said basically what you test is what you are.  I believe their example was if a high school freshman takes it and scores an 80 then they might be able to improve it 5 points or so in their life but there isnt ever going to be a big difference after that age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Billy Marshal hosted the co-owner of S2 and he said practicing doesn't improve your score to a great degree. Studies with top athletes at several schools who take the test from high school to their senior year in college only see roughly ~5 point difference even taking it for years.

That was a terrific interview 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the interesting thing to me is all media says this is heavily driven by Tepper, but everything coming from the front office and coaches says otherwise. I guess the truth doesn't matter, as long as he succeeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he says "if you're 5'6" and can't throw for more than 35 yards then it doesn't matter" How about 5'10" and 50 yards? JK. Seems like an overrated/unknown tool so far and only half the league has bought into it and gone under contract for the data. Curious to see how Levis does with his 93 score

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What?!?!?! Chark's 1,000 yard season was 4 years before he played for us and he only had 525 yards in 15 games as our #1 WR.  Dude has 3,100 yards in 7 seasons, he's the literal definition of a JAG and you think he is better than half our current WR room? T-Mac is literally already better than Chark was at his peak, which again, was years before he ever even put on a Panthers uniform, and there is a real argument to be made that XL and Coker were both better as rookies than Chark was for us in his one season here.
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
×
×
  • Create New...