Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young scored 98 out of 99 on his S2 cognitive test


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

I have a feeling Stoud's score isn't being leaked so it won't hurt his draft stock. I have a feeling his agent went around pleading with teams to withhold that info until after the draft. The fact it isn't being leaked means he must have posted a very mediocre or bad S2 score.

Teams already know his score.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I have a feeling Stoud's score isn't being leaked so it won't hurt his draft stock. I have a feeling his agent went around pleading with teams to withhold that info until after the draft. The fact it isn't being leaked means he must have posted a very mediocre or bad S2 score.


If teams know, then it will hurt his draft stock. At this point it’s just about keeping it from the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Should have gotten a perfect score since he's been taking it since high-school, am I right?

Billy Marshal hosted the co-owner of S2 and he said practicing doesn't improve your score to a great degree. Studies with top athletes at several schools who take the test from high school to their senior year in college only see roughly ~5 point difference even taking it for years.

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Should have gotten a perfect score since he's been taking it since high-school, am I right?

Thats definitely not how it works.  They had the guys who created it on The Roar podcast and they specifically asked them questions about stuff like that.  They said people could improve their score but their are definitely limits.  They said basically what you test is what you are.  I believe their example was if a high school freshman takes it and scores an 80 then they might be able to improve it 5 points or so in their life but there isnt ever going to be a big difference after that age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Billy Marshal hosted the co-owner of S2 and he said practicing doesn't improve your score to a great degree. Studies with top athletes at several schools who take the test from high school to their senior year in college only see roughly ~5 point difference even taking it for years.

That was a terrific interview 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the interesting thing to me is all media says this is heavily driven by Tepper, but everything coming from the front office and coaches says otherwise. I guess the truth doesn't matter, as long as he succeeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he says "if you're 5'6" and can't throw for more than 35 yards then it doesn't matter" How about 5'10" and 50 yards? JK. Seems like an overrated/unknown tool so far and only half the league has bought into it and gone under contract for the data. Curious to see how Levis does with his 93 score

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...