Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Owner of S2 test on scores being leaked..

PanthersGOATFan336

By PanthersGOATFan336,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Growl said:

You don’t seem really well versed in what this “test” is

I'm fully aware of what it is and how it tests processing ability and speed.

But it's not playing football, I was never a fan of the Wonderlick being factored in for players either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted (edited)

Its just a data point, like a 40 time.  We all assume he did bad and that's why he didn't want to share it.  How bad?  Maybe we'll see in time.

The rumor isn't going to hurt his draft position as the teams considering him know the real score.

Young didn't participate in the combine so we're missing a bunch of data points on him.

Speaking of 40 time, someone found one for Bryce somewhere.  Here are 40 times for the QB's :

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/positions/QB/1/2023

 

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm fully aware of what it is and how it tests processing ability and speed.

But it's not playing football, I was never a fan of the Wonderlick being factored in for players either.

you called it a pencil and paper test 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Its just a data point, like a 40 time.  We all assume he did bad and that's why he didn't want to share it.  How bad?  Maybe we'll see in time.

The rumor isn't going to hurt his draft position as the teams considering him know the real score.

Young didn't participate in the combine so we're missing a bunch of data points on him.

Speaking of 40 time, someone found one for Bryce somewhere.  Here are 40 times for the QB's :

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/positions/QB/1/2023

 

Haha like you give a poo just last week you were posting his lowlights.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

 

But continue to believe every thing the Media tells you. Starts at 30 second mark.

 

 

I think all these conspiracy theories are a bit ridiculous.   So a team is putting out fake scores to trick other teams who also have access to the real scores?  This would change public perception but not the perception of the teams who actually have the numbers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Its just a data point, like a 40 time.  We all assume he did bad and that's why he didn't want to share it.  How bad?  Maybe we'll see in time.

The rumor isn't going to hurt his draft position as the teams considering him know the real score.

Young didn't participate in the combine so we're missing a bunch of data points on him.

Speaking of 40 time, someone found one for Bryce somewhere.  Here are 40 times for the QB's :

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/positions/QB/1/2023

 

He absolutely can not run a 4.5. That’s a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, bobcat91 said:

Looks like we are drafting Young, so whatever. But the attempts to hurt Stroud are probably coming from a team who wants him to fall to them. It's pretty sick to do this to a guy, any guy. 

It's not really. These teams all have access to the real information, so they are probably just chuckling at all the fake social media outrage by people who don't have a clue.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...