Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Levis is so cringe


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

It measures how quickly you’re able to process things. Sort of an avenue of intelligence in a sense. Stroud squad  is crazy.

You got in your feelings about Levis receiving what you perceived to be "unnecessary hate", then proceeded to dish out the same level of hate towards Stroud, if not more. If Levis is your guy, that's fine, but you can't go crying about people making fun of him just to then respond by making fun of another QB. You kind of lose your manufactured moral high ground that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, travisura said:

You got in your feelings about Levis receiving what you perceived to be "unnecessary hate", then proceeded to dish out the same level of hate towards Stroud, if not more. If Levis is your guy, that's fine, but you can't go crying about people making fun of him just to then respond by making fun of another QB. You kind of lose your manufactured moral high ground that way.

Levis isn’t my guy but it’s ridiculous that the dude posts a picture of himself bulking and a thread is made about it? I’m asking once again, had Stroud bulked up , would there be a thread saying “he should work on the mental aspect of the game more and stop bulking up” stop trying to validate the hypothetical crap.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

His game film is also low hanging fruit.  I think its bananas, with the peel still on!

Once again, clearly stated, not going to argue the PLAYER but if we’re gonna just bash every single thing the dude does just to do it, is that really fair lol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

Levis isn’t my guy but it’s ridiculous that the dude posts a picture of himself bulking and a thread is made about it? I’m asking once again, had Stroud bulked up , would there be a thread saying “he should work on the mental aspect of the game more and stop bulking up” stop trying to validate the hypothetical crap.

Wait, do you want me to answer your hypothetical question or do you want me to "stop trying to validate the hypothetical crap"?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Cam was cocky. I can't hate a player for thinking that way.

 

Now if he doesn't back it up, that's when you look stupid.

Cam won a high school championship 

Won a national Championship as a backup 

Went to Juco and won another championship 

Then went to Auburn and won another national championship with no NFL players on offense. 
 

Stop comparing Cam to these bums. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

Cam won a high school championship 

Won a national Championship as a backup 

Went to Juco and won another championship 

Then went to Auburn and won another national championship with no NFL players on offense. 
 

Stop comparing Cam to these bums. 

What if one of "these bums" wins a Super Bowl?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

That was mock drafts, not the player rankings. People mocked Stroud to us for a bit but Young was still #1 on big boards. I was talking about consensus on rankings I thought the other guy was too.

#1 on most big boards early had Jalen Carter or Will Anderson. Vegas themselves after the trade had Stroud as our pick for weeks. Not Mock Drafts. Vegas. Young is the top QB among most mocks and such but most folks big boards before the off field drama with Carter had him as the best player in the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Perspective on this year's QB class in general seems to be...less than positive.

 

Next years QB crop might be better than this years but I don’t think you’re going to be pulling more dominant defenders on the line than Carter and Anderson. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...