Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So let’s talk about Levis


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't get all of the hate for the kid. So he posted some weird stuff of him putting mayonnaise in coffee and eating bananas with the peel. Young people post dumb stuff all the time. At least it wasn't him in a gasmask or drag racing.  It also doesn't really say anything about him as a qb or leader.  He had a crap offensive line.  Also, several teams think he needs toe surgery. I'm glad we didn't take him, but i don't have any ill will toward him. Why would I or any of you?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bear Hands said:

Was Baker not the first overall pick and played his entire first season and broke the rookie TD passing record?

 

Baker only came in because the guy in front of him got hurt. Fields came in because Dalton had to miss a few starts. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Levis is a decent QB to take a dice roll on in the 2nd round if you have a starter for 2023 already lined up. Raiders make sense. Someone will move up in the 2nd and take a gamble on him. In the 1st round you want to take a guaranteed starter and Levis is definitely not that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bear Hands said:

Not Baker.

thats why i said 2 out of the 3...  Tyrod Taylor was a bridge until Baker was ready ... but an injury knocked Taylor out of the game with a concussion in week 3. John Dorsey specifically mentioned the plan was to get baker on the field at some point in the season, prior to Taylor's injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

First pro start at Darnold's current age? Yikes.

They were actually talking about the age thing of QBs on multiple different streams I was watching last night... they made some good points. Teams dont care about QB age anymore because of the way the position is protected now. With QBs playing into their late 30s and hitting  their prime in their late 20s... they are not hesitant to go after someone 23/24/25 in the draft. 

Hooker was the subject when they were discussing this.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And then the chargers tried to do the same thing with Justin Herbert 

I'll never forget Tyrod one rather nice year in Buffalo.  He took me to a fantasy final in my big money 14-teamer.  What a journey of a career he's had.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...