Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 5 - The Carolina Panthers Select Jammie Robinson - S - Florida State


rodeo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthers coach Frank Reich doesn't expect RG Austin Corbett (knee) to be ready for Week 1.

Corbett tore his ACL in the Panthers' regular season finale and underwent surgery in January. Returning for Week 1 was never likely for Corbett, who would be only eight months removed from the injury. Corbett should avoid open the year on the PUP list, which would sideline him the first six games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaq said:

Very true, hopefully I’m wrong. Just frustrated, sorta reminds me of the Rashuan Gaulden pick when Chauncey Gardner Johnson went right after him.

Check out what Ellis said.

Sounds like Evero might have had plenty of input on the defensive choices.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheSpecialJuan said:

Panthers coach Frank Reich doesn't expect RG Austin Corbett (knee) to be ready for Week 1.

Corbett tore his ACL in the Panthers' regular season finale and underwent surgery in January. Returning for Week 1 was never likely for Corbett, who would be only eight months removed from the injury. Corbett should avoid open the year on the PUP list, which would sideline him the first six games.

That stinks, but we have some depth to cover it temporarily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Panthers coach Frank Reich doesn't expect RG Austin Corbett (knee) to be ready for Week 1.

Corbett tore his ACL in the Panthers' regular season finale and underwent surgery in January. Returning for Week 1 was never likely for Corbett, who would be only eight months removed from the injury. Corbett should avoid open the year on the PUP list, which would sideline him the first six games.

So sick of starters getting hurt in meaningless games.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

A safety that stuffs the run but isn't good in coverage? Why does that sound so familiar? Oh yeah, these guys 107353935_original.jpg?1293142270  

623991006.jpg.jpg preferred them.

 The too slow tweener DB day 3 pick is a Panther tradition 

i really hope this isn’t that but we’ve seen this book before

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...