Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Anti-tankers…. Never forget!!!!


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, rayzor said:

 and purposely sucking even more would have cured it all....

Crazy Ex Girlfriend Yes GIF

Eh, he’s not wrong about the fact that beating Tampa means that we wouldn’t have Young. At that point if the season I was on the playoff wagon because I figured our shot at the top QB was already gone. If Houston didn’t screw themselves out of the top spot, we also would have had no shot at Young.

If Young truly becomes our hero, losing to Tampa was a good thing for the franchise. We certainly tried to win that game so ranking has nothing to do with this discussion as we didn’t tank, we just plain lost. Had we won, we don’t get Young and we would have lost to the Cowboys. I know it’s hard for folks to understand this, but losing to Tampa did help this franchise assuming Young becomes what we hope he will. If Young flails, well, losing to Tampa hurts even more.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

His injury problems magically disappeared in San Fran also, I wonder if he exaggerated some of his injuries here because he didn't want to take part in the Rhule Circus 

Oh what a safety valve he would have been for Bryce if we didn't trade him 

Sorry man, let’s not disparage CMC. He’s a damn hard worker. Do you truly believe he would exaggerate his injuries or do you think Rhule and co put him on IR when they realized we were done for the season? RBs have a limited shelf life compared to other positions, so is it worth bringing him back if he could play or having him carry the ball 20+ times when we are eliminated? He didn’t have a Barkley ACL or anything remotely severe that he missed any offseason time.

I remember his second injury in 2021 saying to myself that he didn’t appear to be hurt let alone hurt bad when they pulled him. We were 4 games out of first with 5 to play. Even in 2020, he got sat after we just lost a close game to KC in which he had 28 touches. We were 3-6 and playing a 6-3 Tampa team the next week that throttled us week 2. NO was also 6-2 at that time. The powers that be shelved CMC. No chance he exaggerated his injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP is 100% right in the fact that if we win that Bucs game, we set ourselves back 4 years. This offseason would have been GRIM!

As for tanking, I think most of us have different definitions of "tanking". I was ALL FOR tanking, which for me meant resting key starters and letting more young guys play to see what we have (which also meant losing more). Take that last Saints game for example, we lost TWO IMPORTANT players on our o-line to major injuries and now probably won't even be ready for the season. That game was meaningless, you absolutely tank and play your young players and rest key starters to PREVENT that, while also attaining a better draft pick in the process.
 

Edited by Castavar
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Eh, he’s not wrong about the fact that beating Tampa means that we wouldn’t have Young. At that point if the season I was on the playoff wagon because I figured our shot at the top QB was already gone. If Houston didn’t screw themselves out of the top spot, we also would have had no shot at Young.

If Young truly becomes our hero, losing to Tampa was a good thing for the franchise. We certainly tried to win that game so ranking has nothing to do with this discussion as we didn’t tank, we just plain lost. Had we won, we don’t get Young and we would have lost to the Cowboys. I know it’s hard for folks to understand this, but losing to Tampa did help this franchise assuming Young becomes what we hope he will. If Young flails, well, losing to Tampa hurts even more.

Maybe if we had beat Tampa, then we may have gone on to get into the playoffs and won a championship, because everyone knows that "anything can happen in the playoffs." Any given Sunday...and all that jazz. One never knows...🙃

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Here is what I do not understand--when the season is over, after the 16th game of the season vs. Tampa Bay, why not empty your PS and bench for the final game of the season?  Use it like a 2023 extra preseason game for evaluating talent and giving players an opportunity to gain experience.

Instead, we won a meaningless game (that did not cost us draft position) for Steve Wilks' resume.  Our starting RG tore his ACL.  Our starting LG broke his foot. That impacted free agency, the draft, etc.  Why not allow Deonte Brown an opportunity to play?  Any player who was banged up for week 18 should have been placed on IR and a PS player should have been activated.  WR Saunders, OG Brown, and maybe a LB are a few players I wanted to see.

I would have benched Corbett and maybe Moton.  I would have have played Christensen at T and brought Brown up from the PS to get some reps at RG.  I would have played Mays at LG.

Instead, we hoist the 7-10 trophy and sent our Guards to offseason surgery and rehab.

I am very strongly opposed to tanking and have bounced back and forth with several huddlers that seem to want to tank at midseason.   It sends a terrible message to your players and players that may eventually consider coming to Carolina. 

That said, once we were eliminated from contention, I don't think doing this is tanking.  You are evaluating players that could be on the squad 2023.  You are still trying to win but giving players who might have a future in this league a chance to play. 

Unfortunately for us.  Wilks was fighting for his interim position and sent our best out there.  It truly was one of the worst games I have ever seen.  Seemed both teams couldn't get out of their own way. Thankfully, as you pointed out.  It didn't cost us draft positon. 

Carolina mustered up enough to get close enough to kick the game winning FG. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. I think best case scenario we would have beat Dallas. Wilks proves himself to be a decent HC.  A better Ron Rivera. Sam Darnold gets resigned. He ends up being a more talented Delhomme. But never a top 5 QB.

We would have had a good to great team without a super star QB.

We haven't seen what this new team is capable of. Who knows. We might end up being trash. But if Bryce is the real deal then we are going to be dictating games through our offense. Which isn't something we've had since prime Cam.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

when we are mathematically eliminated, i can understand sitting players to reduce risk of injury to key players. if you’re going to do that, put it in that context, and expect whoever does play to put 100% effort into it. telling players to half-ass it is actually increasing their risk of injury, and hurts their development 

You do understand that even tanking doesn’t mean you tell players to half ass, right? Tanking is done with personnel, like not signing a medium level FA QB (like Teddy) and letting Clausen or Weinke or Painter get you a top draft pick or it’s done by resting players in week 17/18 to start rookies and as posted above, not get your two starting guards seriously hurt. As has been said many times, tanking is NOT asking players to play poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Maybe if we had beat Tampa, then we may have gone on to get into the playoffs and won a championship, because everyone knows that "anything can happen in the playoffs." Any given Sunday...and all that jazz. One never knows...🙃

 

Lol, seriously? Fantasy land is elsewhere. Sam Darnold is not winning us a Super Bowl. Let’s get a grasp on reality again.

The supposition that if we make the playoffs, we lose out on Young is realistic. You saw what it took to get to 1st from 9th, imagine the 2025 1st and multiple other picks to get from 19 to 9. Plus you’d need Chicago to be willing to drop that far which is highly unlikely based on their desire for a top tackle.

I’ve been wanting a top rookie QB since we let Cam go. I’m excited we have one but damn I’d be upset if I knew we let that go just to get beat by Dallas. Young or bust. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WhoKnows said:

Eh, he’s not wrong about the fact that beating Tampa means that we wouldn’t have Young. At that point if the season I was on the playoff wagon because I figured our shot at the top QB was already gone. If Houston didn’t screw themselves out of the top spot, we also would have had no shot at Young.

If Young truly becomes our hero, losing to Tampa was a good thing for the franchise. We certainly tried to win that game so ranking has nothing to do with this discussion as we didn’t tank, we just plain lost. Had we won, we don’t get Young and we would have lost to the Cowboys. I know it’s hard for folks to understand this, but losing to Tampa did help this franchise assuming Young becomes what we hope he will. If Young flails, well, losing to Tampa hurts even more.

Yes he is, because he is saying we should have purposely tanked to get a better pick.

The real question is, does or should the team TRY to lose do they can get a better pick? Because that's what tanking is, right? Trying to lose? You might say that it's just not trying to win, but that's the same thing.

Trying not to win is trying to lose and there are implications that go WAY beyond trying to lose so we get a better pick. And it's those implications that makes that myopic choice to tank a really bad and foolish idea.

He said those who didn't want to tank weren't looking at the big picture, but it's him and everyone else saying by that we should tank who isn't looking at the bigger picture. It's a very narrow-minded view that ONLY looks at the draft.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Here is what I do not understand--when the season is over, after the 16th game of the season vs. Tampa Bay, why not empty your PS and bench for the final game of the season?  Use it like a 2023 extra preseason game for evaluating talent and giving players an opportunity to gain experience.

Instead, we won a meaningless game (that did not cost us draft position) for Steve Wilks' resume.  Our starting RG tore his ACL.  Our starting LG broke his foot. That impacted free agency, the draft, etc.  Why not allow Deonte Brown an opportunity to play?  Any player who was banged up for week 18 should have been placed on IR and a PS player should have been activated.  WR Saunders, OG Brown, and maybe a LB are a few players I wanted to see.

I would have benched Corbett and maybe Moton.  I would have have played Christensen at T and brought Brown up from the PS to get some reps at RG.  I would have played Mays at LG.

Instead, we hoist the 7-10 trophy and sent our Guards to offseason surgery and rehab.

I agree, I would have been fine benching starters for the last game.  Saints were clearly desperately trying to lose that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Lol, seriously? Fantasy land is elsewhere. Sam Darnold is not winning us a Super Bowl. Let’s get a grasp on reality again.

The supposition that if we make the playoffs, we lose out on Young is realistic. You saw what it took to get to 1st from 9th, imagine the 2025 1st and multiple other picks to get from 19 to 9. Plus you’d need Chicago to be willing to drop that far which is highly unlikely based on their desire for a top tackle.

I’ve been wanting a top rookie QB since we let Cam go. I’m excited we have one but damn I’d be upset if I knew we let that go just to get beat by Dallas. Young or bust. 
 

You do realize sarcasm, right? The point is that tanking only exists in the minds of desperate people. It does not exist for professionals fighting to keep their jobs. I can play the what-if game on most things. It's not really a productive exercise. Just deal with what is and hope for a better future. That's all you can do when you're really not part of the planning or decision-making.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This article (ESPN) got me thinking and I think on paper.  Thought I would share.  This thinking involves realistic cap analysis, needs, the draft, and free agency.  I think it realistically addresses Edge and LB fairly well.  OL (not 2026 so much, but 2027 and beyond looks good).  The free agent S has deep range and coverage skills, something that killed us on third downs last year, imo.  Beyond Edge, LB, S, and OL depth, that is about it.  I took a flyer on DT and WR depth late in the draft, but at CB (Horn, Jackson, Smith-Wade, and Thornton), QB, RB, TE, etc. we are going to rely on undrafted free agents.  No cap room left. EDGE:  In the $7m per year range, the edge from Atlanta Ebiketie got pressure at a high rate in reduced snaps. With Atlanta adding 2 edge rushers as rookies who seemed to do well (Pearce is one of them--*) but he got pressure in limited snaps at a high rate 16.9% (one in eight pass rush).   He is 27 and played in 384 snaps.  PFF Score of 74.9.  had 2 sacks.  If he had a normal workload, based on his limited play, he would have had about 5 to 6 sacks and about 60 pressures.  However, it is likely he would be rotational here, logging about 500 snaps.   A lot of this decision depends on how we feel about Princely.  If they like his development, you probably do not draft an Edge in round 1 or maybe even 2 for several reasons (and many may disagree with this logic, but a good GM has long-term vision):  1. That would give you 3 Edge contracts to negotiate in 3-4 years.  2.  Edges take time to develop.  They would peak around 2028.  The Panthers are in "win now" mode, I think. Mafe (Seahawks, PFF 69.2) is another option, but he is more along the lines of Scourton and Jones II.  He would command a contract in the $10m range. Kwity Paye (Indianapolis, PFF 68.7) He is about 28 and is expected to sign a deal around $18m per season.  I am not that impressed, but he is considered "above average."  I'd rather have Ebiketie from Atlanta for $10m per season less. Center:  The center position in the draft is looking better.  There are some short armed OTs (like Parker, Duke, et al) who will project inside (G,C). Personally, I like the Center position in this draft--let Mays walk.  Re-sign Corbett, and draft a C in round 3.   Linebacker:  I am not sure what we should do here.   I think Morgan will fall in love with Cincinnati's Golday, and we would take him at #51.  Rodriguez (Texas Tech) in round 3 could be a steal.  However, I am not sure that I see value after Styles in round 1.  I think Devin Lloyd will want elite meny and he is not elite--he is good.  He will ask for $15m per season.  Leo Chenel (KC, 75.1 PFF, est. $5m) is a much better option. Safety:  I think Kam Curl would be a great fit here. (Rams, 2 Ints 87 tackles) he is very versatile. Expected to get between $10m and $12m per year, however.  In the draft, I think they like Bud Clark who should be there in round 4.  Are Moehrig, Ransom, and Simmons enough?  Tony Adams (63.7 PFF) a deep safety known for his range.  He is expected to get a 3-year, $20m deal on the market. Based on what I am seeing here and the way I am thinking right now on 2/21, here is what I might do: Free Agency CAP: I am going to assume we can clear about $50m by restructuring the contracts of Horn, Lewis, Hunt, and Brown and cutting AShawn Robinson.  We could (bold move) extend Ickey Ekwonu--considering his situation, it could be beneficial to him long term, and his guaranteed salary could be spread over the next 3 years or so. Re-sign veterans:  OL:  Corbett ($3m), Nijman ($4m), Christensen ($2.5m--2 years $5m), Jake Curhan ($1.4m-2 years, $3m).  BC may be ready around mid season, Curhan has experience at RT and G, and played well.  He has played LT in preseason.  There is NOTHING in free agency at LT--most sucked in 2025 and/or are old.  WR: Jalen Coker ($8m--4 years, $32m), LB: Rozeboom ($3.5--2 years, $7m) Cherelus ($1m)  ST: Isiah Simmons ($1.5m).  TOTAL:  Approx. $25m New Free Agents:  Linebacker:  Leo Chenal (KC, age 26) estimated $5m. Safety:  Tony Adams, (NYJ, age 27)  estimated $7m Edge: Arnold Ebikete (Atl, age 27)  estimated $7m Draft: Round 1:  Cashius Howell, Edge Texas AM (This pick gives the Panthers a situational edge rusher to pair with Princely while Ebikete and Scourton start.  Jones II could be cut to save about $4m in cap room. Round 2: Caleb Tiernan, LT, Northwestern (Good pass protector who needs work in run blocking.  I wanted Golday LB here, but if we sign Chenel, the need is lessened at LB if we re-sign Rozeboom. Tiernan is solid). Round 3:  Jake Slaughter C, Florida (Groom behind Corbett for a while, but Slaughter is an impressive C who should be ready by 2027). Round 4:  Demetrius Crownover, RT Texas AM (This guy can develop as a backup until Moton decides to leave) Round 5:  Aiden Fisher, ILB Indiana (could be a nice fit in this system.  Smart, with special teams ability)' Round 6: Ty Montgomery, WR John Carroll Univ.  (very productive with good size and hands.  a gamble, but worth a sixth) Round 7:  James Thompson Jr.  DT, Illinois (was a beast at the Shrine bowl practices and game.  For some reason, there have been a lot of undrafted free agents and day 3 DTs succeed in the NFL.  This could be one.)                          
    • thats the best picture they could come up with for him?
×
×
  • Create New...