Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next Steps...Assessing the Team


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Still an awful roster

We have a PG, SF/SG, and C with nice potential. Hayward and Rozier are solid vets to have if we resign Miles (not a fan) that’s another big man. Not a great roster, but could be fun in with the right staff to develop them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Guess I'm a homer but with the addition of Bridges and Miller I think the team is very solid.

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I have no expectations for this team to do anything good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 33inNC said:

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I have no expectations for this team to do anything good. 

Mark Williams looks like he could be legit as well, that's a nice starting 5. Granted Miller is the unknown. Very smooth but the shot looks a little flat. Much like a Miller Lite. I thought Lamelos shot was ugly too but hey if it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do not turn Gordon's expiring contract into a poo sandwich of another overpaid player that we have to eat for 3 years.  Just let him play out the contract and move on. I'm sick of watching this team swap bad contract for worse contract every fuging year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That team made the play in game two years ago with Bridges and Lamelo. Now they've got Williams, Miller and nick Smith to add to that. Possibly able to move rozier or Hayward for another piece. 

 

No reason they don't make the playoffs as at least the 7th or 8th seed, but should be the 6th if everyone comes back and plays like they can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Is a Miles Bridges for Paul George sign n trade realistic?

 

Clippers have PG on the trade block. Would be nice to get Miller his GOAT to mentor him.

Maybe Miles and Rozier plus some. Would Miller and PG be too similar of players though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People would hate it, but try to sign Bridges to a team friendly longer term deal while his value is low. If Bridges would go for it. If he plays well the team either has a young player on a good contract or an extremely valuable trade asset. That’s the type of thing that can set up long term sustained success.

Also the obvious fire Mitch and Cliff for the love of all that is good. But at this point the team has already missed out on several good coaches by dragging their feet.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think we have some revisionist around it here because of all the drama around Tepper's involvement. If you pull up any scouting report from the time you'll see the same take. WalterFootball's report sums up the media's thoughts on him well: "Young has everything the NFL is looking for in a quarterback except in terms of weight and height." He was the consensus top QB of his draft and the only real question mark they had about him was whether his body could hold up in the NFL. The infamous Steph Curry comparison the Panthers latched onto came from Albert Breer. The excuses I've heard for him are more anecdotal. Bryce Young's development is the only bullet point most NFL fans have on the Panthers right now. That and the coaching turnover. If you're not actually watching our games it's easy to believe this is just a dysfunctional organization that doesn't know how to unleash this talented Heisman winner.  I've seen media and fans alike run with that narrative way more than criticizing Young outright. Whenever we win there's flocks who use it as proof that the Panthers just need to be patient.  
    • So maybe 1-3 vs playoff teams, going by standings as of today. I guess that is an improvement.  We are just about improved enough to be in purgatory draft wise. It really isn’t so bad in the 1st unless you really want that top QB or maybe edge guy because there are usually plenty of good players at the top but it hurts you some as get deeper in the draft. 
×
×
  • Create New...