Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Meatball opens his mouth again


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Pup McBarky said:

He'll get them 8-9 wins in a year or two and maybe even eventually get to 10, depending on who they play, but they'll be slightly above average...not close to their former glory.

They're not going to win near that many games. He's getting canned in two or three years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

He wants to be Edgy, but nobody ever showed him how to do it. So he wound up  being really bad at it.

He acted like being against kids getting bullied was some sort of virtuous opinion that only he has and advocated killing someone over it…but yeah I’m the one tryna be edgy.

Edited by RJK
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RJK said:

He acted like being against kids getting bullied was some sort of virtuous opinion that only he has and advocated killing someone over it…but yeah I’m just tryna be edgy 

 

Dude? There are very few ppl on this board that throw less sh/t than you. Playing the victim isn't in your wheelhouse.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

Dude? There are very few ppl on this board that throw less sh/t than you. Playing the victim isn't in your wheelhouse.

You must have me confused with someone else. I try to be as middle of the road as possible but you’ll find examples of being inflammatory for comedic effect. Are you that guy who freaked out because I suggested we should wait for Jammie to play a snap before we pencil him in at nickel? If so, you seem to take all this very personal for some reason. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RJK said:

He acted like being against kids getting bullied was some sort of virtuous opinion that only he has and advocated killing someone over it…but yeah I’m the one tryna be edgy.

You could have stated this, instead of being otherwise.  Instead ya just look stupid. 

Virtuous? Not at all. 

And I have zero problems pulling the trigger when it needs to be pulled.  

And here you are, defending stupidity.  

Get a clue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

He wants to be Edgy, but nobody ever showed him how to do it. So he wound up  being really bad at it.

He's clueless, and tries to act smarter than he really is. Probably is a politician.  

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It baffles me how Rhule tries so hard to not accept full responsibility for his failure here. Tepper and Hurney where foolish enough to give him total control over the whole organization so of course he's going to be held response for the failure. You best believe if he would've been successful here, he would've been singing his own praises nonstop about how his "Brand" made us a winner. I wouldn't be the least bit shocked if we have some kind of success here this year Rhule will come out of the woodwork to say how he laid the foundation for it and try to take some of the credit. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I thought Nebraska was one of the worst places for him, or maybe anybody.  They still have visions of success from over 20 years ago.  Regardless of what I think of The Process, anybody taking that job is set up for failure against that standard. 

His "rebound relationship" would have probably been better off at Colorado or Arizona State.  The expectations are lower, and if he is able to produce 8-10 wins a year at those schools, he would be a hero.

I'm not sure Saban could restore Nebraska to its past glory.

Yeah I thought ASU would've been a better fit in regards to managing and meeting expectations, especially with the upcoming departures in the PAC. Nebraska's heyday seems well past, and there aren't many compelling reasons for someone to go play in the middle of nowhere at what has become an afterthought and overshadowed by the competition.

That said, there's no reason to think he can't have them competitive with the rest of the Big 10, other than the 3 or 4 usual powers at the top in that conference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with OP notion, QBs always get credited for game winning drives even if they do minimal. Just last night Caleb got credited for a GE drive when they basically ran the ball the whole drive and only had to go 36 yards.   And there are drives where Bryce could of had a game winning drive if not for a Legette drop vs Philly or a Chubba fumble vs Tampa 
    • You are actually, genuinely comparing Bryce to Jimmy fuging Pickles? Jimmy accounted for 3 touchdowns in his 10 starts in 2010. In Bryce’s 10 games post benching last year, he accounted for 20 touchdowns. Jimmy threw three touchdowns in 2010. Three. Bryce has thrown 10 touchdowns through 6 games. He is currently on track to throw for 3300 yards, 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. Wtf are we even talking about anymore. I mean seriously
    • Tepper? The guy that directs the coaches towards goals that he set for them… that guy. He is the one.    I don’t think he ever was going to be expelled from class, they had him come in for garbage time maybe the 2nd week he was benched.  I will say this. People said he wasn’t under pressure the last part of the year when he did better, but he was fighting for his career and that’s pressure. And he saved his career too. I don’t reject him for those kinds of things I reject him for the physical things. I have always brought it down to he has slim margin for error and has to be perfect. People with the tool set have a little fatter margin for error. Why make it harder on yourself? Got nothing to do with hating him.  I am no statistician but game that margin thing out a lot and see how that works. 
×
×
  • Create New...