Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith and Cameron Wolfe discuss Bryce and the Receiving Corps


jfra78
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, CRA said:

I mean, maybe I’m missing someone but what QB is out there winning with a receiving corp by committee?   MVP caliber QBs?   And even a Brady or a Cam had dominant TEs in the passing era years they did great with bland WR corps. 

Cam did in 2015.  Jake did it in 2003.  Cam elevated everyone's play including Olsen in 2015. We had the supposed worse receivers in the league when Benjamin was hurt.  Jake had Moose and a Smitty who was years away from greatness. If that was our team alone there are tons of examples. And no Brady had crap for receivers much of his time there. All he had was a tight end to go to.

Edited by panthers55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Cam did in 2015.  Jake did it in 2003.  Cam elevated everyone's play including Olsen in 2015. We had the supposed worse receivers in the league when Benjamin was hurt.  Jake had Moose and a Smitty who was years away from greatness. If that was our team alone there are tons of examples. And no Brady had crap for receivers much of his time there. All he had was a tight end to go to.

I already addressed Cam.  Or Brady.  Or Lamar or Mahomes.  If you got a MVP caliber QB and a Pro TE.....they can make a weak WR cast work.   That's not the model we are playing out in 2023. 

89 wasn't years away from greatness.  He was instantly great when given the opportunity in 2003.  Dominate postseason in 2003.  The best season of his career was his next healthy one after that season.  And Moose wasn't some JAG either in 2003.   Add to all that a top 10 defense, Pro Bowl in the backfield, roided up OL. 

I just don't see all these comparisons people are trying to make.  We got a rookie QB and a bland cast around him this year.  It is what it is.  It's good enough to develop Bryce some.  But we need better skill position talent around.  Don't see how that is that big of a debate. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, rayzor said:

If you've got a clutch intelligent playmaker QB, he turns the WRs into big play WRs. It's all about opportunity and a QB like Bryce sees and takes advantage of opportunities in clutch situations.

Of course I will always take a playmaker QB over a playmaker WR, a great QB will have more impact than a great WR. Young played lights out with Jameson Williams and Metchie during his sophomore year and he continued to play well his junior year despite throwing to nobodies. Our current WR room is unproven outside of Theilan and I hope they just haven't been able to prove themselves because of poor QB play, I hope someone steps up this year. It's time for Terrace and Leviska to show up or get out! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/11/2023 at 8:42 AM, panthers55 said:

If you think about it receiver by committee means you can't shut us down by concentrating on 1 or 2 players. Instead of 1 1400 yards receiver we might have 3 guys with 500 yards a piece. Instead of a negative it could be a positive.

Cams MVP year was with jags, I do believe it makes the opposing defense have to second guess a lot more when game planning. If the QB sucks it doesn't matter either way

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I already addressed Cam.  Or Brady.  Or Lamar or Mahomes.  If you got a MVP caliber QB and a Pro TE.....they can make a weak WR cast work.   That's not the model we are playing out in 2023. 

89 wasn't years away from greatness.  He was instantly great when given the opportunity in 2003.  Dominate postseason in 2003.  The best season of his career was his next healthy one after that season.  And Moose wasn't some JAG either in 2003.   Add to all that a top 10 defense, Pro Bowl in the backfield, roided up OL. 

I just don't see all these comparisons people are trying to make.  We got a rookie QB and a bland cast around him this year.  It is what it is.  It's good enough to develop Bryce some.  But we need better skill position talent around.  Don't see how that is that big of a debate. 

To your point, Smitty had almost 1200 yards and Moose had 800 some... We don't have a single receiver that we could expect to be near Moose or Smitty's abilities in 2003. We actually do have someone that reminds me of Proehl, though, and it's possible TMJ or others step up in unexpected ways...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve mentions 0-22 yard range as being Bryce's bresd and butter, while acknowledging he's not going to uncork the ball. If he can somehow get to the point where Brees was that a 60 yard throw isn't impossible, or improbable, he could be very, very good. But if he has trouble stretching the field, that opens up a whole new window of aggression for safeties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

If he can somehow get to the point where Brees was that a 60 yard throw isn't impossible, or improbable, he could be very, very good.

Brees attempted over 9400 passes while with the Saints, none of which traveled more than 50 yards in the air.

https://thespun.com/top-stories/look-crazy-passing-stat-about-drew-brees-jameis-winston

Edited by Pup McBarky
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...