Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Saints will win the division, we’re sending Chicago a top 10 pick

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheBigKat Grand Master

TheBigKat

Posted
Posted

Two preseason games and first team has mustered 3 points.

 

Young might be good but he’s not Cam, he’ll never ‘will’ the team to victory, he’s going to be a great system QB

 

 Defense got smoked by a Barkley’less Giants offense

 

 but yea it’s preseason

  • Pie 9
  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 43
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Two preseason games and first team has mustered 3 points.

 

Young might be good but he’s not Cam, he’ll never ‘will’ the team to victory, he’s going to be a great system QB

 

 Defense got smoked by a Barkley’less Giants offense

 

 but yea it’s preseason

Playcalling and players just absolutely are horrendous 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Playcalling and players just absolutely are horrendous 

And if the Panthers had gone into preseason with the goal of 4-0 and scheming every game, I'd be pissed.

2008 Lions, 2017 Browns were preseason 4-0 winners turned 0-16 regular season losers.

2009 Colts were 1-3 preseason losers turned 14-2 regular season juggernauts.

Y'all are quite funny if you think a respectable team actually aims to win each preseason game and not evaluate. It's more encouraging to see weaknesses since that means a good coaching staff will have that on tape and actually scheme around that.

Now come regular season if the coaches don't use this great opportunity to adjust for the Panthers weaknesses, then can them.

But for now, it's preseason and last thing that matters is how we scheme in scrimmage.

Edited by Saca312
  • Pie 9
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CP1 Newbie

CP1

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Two preseason games and first team has mustered 3 points.

 

Young might be good but he’s not Cam, he’ll never ‘will’ the team to victory, he’s going to be a great system QB

 

 Defense got smoked by a Barkley’less Giants offense

 

 but yea it’s preseason

I know it’s preseason but there are disturbing signs here. Tackling is horrible. OL is real bad. We don’t appear to be well coached like we are lost out there

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

And if the Panthers had gone into preseason with the goal of 4-0 and scheming every game, I'd be pissed.

2008 Lions, 2017 Browns were preseason 4-0 winners turned 0-16 regular season losers.

2009 Colts were 1-3 preseason losers turned 14-2 regular season juggernauts.

Y'all are quite funny if a respectable team actually aims to win each preseason game. It's more encouraging to see weaknesses since that means a good coaching staff will have that on tape and actually scheme around that.

Now come regular season if the coaches don't use this great opportunity to adjust for the Panthers weaknesses, then can them.

But for now, it's preseason and last thing that matters is how we scheme in scrimmage.

A lot of good dominating the Bills in the last preseason game last year did lol. You're 100% correct.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Natural Experienced

The Natural

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

And if the Panthers had gone into preseason with the goal of 4-0 and scheming every game, I'd be pissed.

2008 Lions, 2017 Browns were preseason 4-0 winners turned 0-16 regular season losers.

2009 Colts were 1-3 preseason losers turned 14-2 regular season juggernauts.

Y'all are quite funny if you think a respectable team actually aims to win each preseason game and not evaluate. It's more encouraging to see weaknesses since that means a good coaching staff will have that on tape and actually scheme around that.

Now come regular season if the coaches don't use this great opportunity to adjust for the Panthers weaknesses, then can them.

But for now, it's preseason and last thing that matters is how we scheme in scrimmage.

Perfectly stated.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

And if the Panthers had gone into preseason with the goal of 4-0 and scheming every game, I'd be pissed.

2008 Lions, 2017 Browns were preseason 4-0 winners turned 0-16 regular season losers.

2009 Colts were 1-3 preseason losers turned 14-2 regular season juggernauts.

Y'all are quite funny if you think a respectable team actually aims to win each preseason game and not evaluate. It's more encouraging to see weaknesses since that means a good coaching staff will have that on tape and actually scheme around that.

Now come regular season if the coaches don't use this great opportunity to adjust for the Panthers weaknesses, then can them.

But for now, it's preseason and last thing that matters is how we scheme in scrimmage.

What game are you watching? Preseason regular season or flag football. These guys aren’t good. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...