Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What I'm looking for in the third preseason game


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Icege said:

Right? Frankie Luvu is literally right there.

Von Bell, Xavier Woods, Jeremy Chinn, and Sam Franklin Jr are just ok?

DeShawn Williams started for the Broncos last season on the DL for their 3-4.

Justin Houston just signed.

Folks don't have to believe that the defense will play up to their hopes and desires, but willfully dissociating from reality isn't going to help either. 😮

 

Negativity is the prevailing sentiment around here. In order to breed that fear you have to sensationalize every little fault. Whether real or imagined. 

 

I really have to wonder if all these folks that go overboard to sow the seeds of fear actually believe what they are promoting? Way too many people seem to believe that this team actually does lack talent. Is it because they actually believe it, or are they just trying to scare folks into joining the negativity?

 

This team has a shot if Bryce plays well. Not sure why that seems to scare so many people?

 

Ah hell, I know what I want to say. I just can't quite put it all together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Negativity is the prevailing sentiment around here. In order to breed that fear you have to sensationalize every little fault. Whether real or imagined. 

 

I really have to wonder if all these folks that go overboard to sow the seeds of fear actually believe what they are promoting? Way too many people seem to believe that this team actually does lack talent. Is it because they actually believe it, or are they just trying to scare folks into joining the negativity?

 

This team has a shot if Bryce plays well. Not sure why that seems to scare so many people?

 

Ah hell, I know what I want to say. I just can't quite put it all together. 

It's a misery circle jerk.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly what I wanted to see last night.  Bryce was able to operate an offense without having to run for his life although he showed tremendous ability to evade the rush and move both inside and outside the pocket while looking downfield. I think offensive line looked better and hopefully Ickey will not to stop moving his feet when he makes the initial block.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...