Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chark Injured?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

And this is exactly why I was against signing him, making your rookie QB’s #1 WR a guy with his injury history was never a good idea.

I don't think is was their plan for him to be the #1. They just wanted to add his play making ability.  His talent naturally took him to the top of the depth chart. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I don't think is was their plan for him to be the #1. They just wanted to add his play making ability.  His talent naturally took him to the top of the depth chart. 

It 100% was their plan to have him be the #1, nobody else on the team made any sense as a #1 (not that Chark did either, but he's closer to a #1 than anyone else on the team right now).

MAYBE they were hoping that TMJ would show out and take it over, but that certainly wasn't what they would have been planning for.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

It 100% was their plan to have him be the #1, nobody else on the team made any sense as a #1 (not that Chark did either, but he's closer to a #1 than anyone else on the team right now).

MAYBE they were hoping that TMJ would show out and take it over, but that certainly wasn't what they would have been planning for.

You're reaching. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You're reaching. 

How?  In what way?  Just think it through logically

Thielen, while I love what he will be for this offense and he was my #1 wanted FA once we made the trade for the #1 pick because he'll be perfect for a rookie QB, is unequivocally NOT a #1 WR at this point in his career, he's a possession/slot WR who will make his value most apparent on short 3rd downs.

Mingo isn't a #1 WR to start his career, if he was, he wouldn't have been a 2nd round pick.

Shenault?  Byrd?  Smith?  All clearly not even starting WRs, let alone a #1.

So again, the plan was clearly for it to be Chark or hope for a prayer that TMJ would make a massive leap this offseason and be the #1, which in itself never seemed likely to start the year anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

How?  In what way?  Just think it through logically

Thielen, while I love what he will be for this offense and he was my #1 wanted FA once we made the trade for the #1 pick because he'll be perfect for a rookie QB, is unequivocally NOT a #1 WR at this point in his career, he's a possession/slot WR who will make his value most apparent on short 3rd downs.

Mingo isn't a #1 WR to start his career, if he was, he wouldn't have been a 2nd round pick.

Shenault?  Byrd?  Smith?  All clearly not even starting WRs, let alone a #1.

So again, the plan was clearly for it to be Chark or hope for a prayer that TMJ would make a massive leap this offseason and be the #1, which in itself never seemed likely to start the year anyways.

You sure do ignore poo. 

No one signs an oft injured player with plans for them to be their number 1 receiver. 

There is nothing else to debate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

Does Watkins still have wheels to be a deep threat? That's about the only WR I see out there right now that could fit that role. Maybe someone will come open in cut downs.

I think you would be better off looking at the last round of cuts on Aug 29th than looking at the present FA pool.  There will be young and vet talent cut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You sure do ignore poo. 

No one signs an oft injured player with plans for them to be their number 1 receiver. 

There is nothing else to debate. 

Okay then, who was the team planning on having as their #1 WR this year then?

I'm not saying what your saying here is dumb, because I clearly agree that signing someone with his injury history to be our #1 was a bad idea.  But it's clear that it was their plan as he was the best WR on the roster, health aside, hence why I was never happy with the signing as I thought it was a stupid plan.

And as bad as a plan as it was to have someone with his injury history be the #1, having TMJ or Mingo be the planned #1 WR is an even worse plan.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

How?  In what way?  Just think it through logically

Thielen, while I love what he will be for this offense and he was my #1 wanted FA once we made the trade for the #1 pick because he'll be perfect for a rookie QB, is unequivocally NOT a #1 WR at this point in his career, he's a possession/slot WR who will make his value most apparent on short 3rd downs.

Mingo isn't a #1 WR to start his career, if he was, he wouldn't have been a 2nd round pick.

Shenault?  Byrd?  Smith?  All clearly not even starting WRs, let alone a #1.

So again, the plan was clearly for it to be Chark or hope for a prayer that TMJ would make a massive leap this offseason and be the #1, which in itself never seemed likely to start the year anyways.

 

They clocked Thielen at over 20mph during practice. Seems like he's just fine to me. But then again, I don't think the sky is falling either.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quickbooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 a free application provided by Intuit, designed to diagnose and fix various QuickBooks errors with ease. With a comprehensive set of tools, the Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 simplifies the troubleshooting process and saves you valuable time. So why should you choose the QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438? Here are some key benefits: If you don't know how to use the QuickBooks Tool Hub, after following this article on How to Download QuickBooks Tool Hub please see the detailed article on How to Use QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438. Please feel free to comment and subscribe to our posts for free tutorials like this. Benefits of Using QuickBooks Tool Hub? Saves time: The QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 saves time by providing a one-stop-shop for fixing various QuickBooks errors like QuickBooks Error H202, QuickBooks Error H505, QuickBooks Unrecoverable Error , QuickBooks Error 1904, QuickBooks Error 1328, QuickBooks Data Recovery etc. You don't need to search for different tools or methods to fix the error. Just download the tool using the  QuickBooks Tool Hub +1-844-476-5438 Download Link below. Easy to use: The QuickBooks Tool Hub is easy to use, even for non-technical users. The on-screen instructions are clear and straightforward, making it easy to diagnose and fix QuickBooks errors. Comprehensive: From network issues to installation problems, the Tool Hub covers it all. No more jumping between different applications or support forums.  
    • Ehh NYR had more scoring opportunities and Florida is healthy with an elite net minder. Only fault I have on Rod is his goalie decision. At some point, the players deserve some balme. 
    • I went to McDonald's at lunch got a combo for $12. It was ok. The next day I ordered lunch from Cracker Barrel got the broccoli cheddar chicken, steak fries, and 2 biscuits paid $12 with tip. Guess which was better. 
×
×
  • Create New...