Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Murph said:

South Carolina is a very good team talent wise. They just didn’t show it Saturday and we’re completely unprepared for UNC’s aggressive scheme on D. They started slow last year and turned into giant killers. I fully expect them to win 8-9 games this year. 

SC lost a lot of talent off of what was really Dr Jeckyl and Mr Hyde team last year.  Hard to really gauge them. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Dominating the LOS

UNC OL : 0 sacks allowed

UNC DL: -2 yards rushing allowed

UNC: 8 sacks 

I know Carolina played a terrible team but man if they can keep this up…look out 

I think though temper it for now. Their QB was what 114qb rating, 30/36 or something like that. Sounds like the secondary is shaky.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I think though temper it for now. Their QB was what 114qb rating, 30/36 or something like that. Sounds like the secondary is shaky.  

Secondary took a big hit with DeAndre Boykins OFY. Dude was poised to have a big season. I still think they’ll be better than the past couple of seasons by losing some bonehead me first players. 
 

also - Rattler is a solid QB. Not sure UNC will face another QB at his level aside from Clemson. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

Y’all know nobody wants any part of Alabama, Georgia, or the majority of the SEC. Good start for the ACC, but consistency is the key. 

The SEC is top heavy, like always.

Alabama and Georgia lead the way, there's a couple of good teams (probably Tennessee) and then a whole host of teams that trade off the SEC brand. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The SEC is top heavy, like always.

Alabama and Georgia lead the way, there's a couple of good teams (probably Tennessee) and then a whole host of teams that trade off the SEC brand. 

Yep. This is always the reality. 2-3 elite teams, 2-3 good teams, and then the rest of the filler who chant "SEC! SEC! SEC!" to ride the coattails of the aforementioned relevant teams.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. This is always the reality. 2-3 elite teams, 2-3 good teams, and then the rest of the filler who chant "SEC! SEC! SEC!" to ride the coattails of the aforementioned relevant teams.

 

Was typing just about the same response. If FSU was an SEC school, they’d jump up to #3 in the rankings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

Was typing just about the same response. If FSU was an SEC school, they’d jump up to #3 in the rankings.

If FSU was a SEC school they would have started the season higher than 8.  Clemson would be higher than 9 too.  All SEC schools get favoritism in the early polls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...