Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 1: Panthers vs Falcons


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Captain Morgan said:

does anybody know if there is a new Falcons message board?

Who is there fan that checks in here on game weeks....would like to know how there fans feel heading into this weekend, especially the injury report

https://falcons.boards.net/

Have to register to read though. 

Edited by Ball4life
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While leading the league in interception as a rookie so I guess he wants to break many records good or bad. One thing Bryce won't do is led the league in picks cause his accuracy transition well as a pro even when under pressure. Can't say the same about CJ who i think will likely toss way more picks than TD. Hopefully he doesn't end up like Sam D in Houston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, CRA said:

Peyton Manning rewrote the rookie passing record book across the board as a passer.   That’s not him intentionally tanking lol. 
 

While leading the league in interception as a rookie so I guess he wants to break many records good or bad. One thing Bryce won't do is led the league in picks cause his accuracy transition well as a pro even when under pressure. Can't say the same about CJ who i think will likely toss way more picks than TD. Hopefully he doesn't end up like Sam D in Houston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not feeling great about this game based on what I saw in three preseason games. 
 

Cons are going to try and run the ball down our throats and I’m wondering if we are too light up front to stop them.

Not worried about Ridder throwing, our secondary is healthy(LOL) and will shut him down. Horn will dominate Pitts.

On offense our line really needs to show up and keep Bryce off the ground. We also need to click in the run game and not put it all on our rookie QB

Cons 21

Cats  17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GhostWhispah said:

Peyton won only 1 game as a rookie tossing like 37 interceptions which i think he was tanking to help his team draft better players to win in the long run. Troy Aikman won only 1 game as a rookie too to get better players in the draft which got them 4 SB in his career. Should Bryce do the same thing in his rookie season. If he has an awful season, we will know why and not cause he is a bust.

Unfortunately we traded our 2 1st to Chicago and will only benefit the Bear not us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestPanthers said:

Unfortunately we traded our 2 1st to Chicago and will only benefit the Bear not us. 

Sad but true. I much rather give the 49ers a 4th round pick for Trey Lance. The question is what is more important in a franchise QB - an athletically gifted but extremely raw QB or a well polish NFL ready to play now in a tiny stick boy body? Would Reich rather find ways to protect his franchise QB or developed a raw QB in a body like Hurts on steroids with a much stronger cannon of an arm? 

https://www.tmz.com/2021/03/12/trey-lance-north-dakota-state-quarterback-nfl-pro-day/

I know who i want being a huge Cam fan...

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predict the Panthers will dispose of the Falcons in game one of the season. Game two will be against the Saints.  The Panthers versus the Saints will be close, but the Panthers have always had the saints number in the past.
 

I think after the first two NFL games, we will have a good idea of how strong the Panthers are.

Panthers 35 *

Falcons 20

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Green-Ghost said:

I predict the Panthers will dispose of the Falcons in game one of the season. Game two will be against the Saints.  The Panthers versus the Saints will be close, but the Panthers have always had the saints number in the past.
 

I think after the first two NFL games, we will have a good idea of how strong the Panthers are.

Panthers 35 *

Falcons 20

I’m not scared of Ridder, just the falcons current state of being in year 2 of Smiths system as opposed to year 1 for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Not feeling great about this game based on what I saw in three preseason games. 
 

Cons are going to try and run the ball down our throats and I’m wondering if we are too light up front to stop them.

Not worried about Ridder throwing, our secondary is healthy(LOL) and will shut him down. Horn will dominate Pitts.

On offense our line really needs to show up and keep Bryce off the ground. We also need to click in the run game and not put it all on our rookie QB

Cons 21

Cats  17

Horn on Pitts? I was thinking that will be Chinn’s match up and Horn will shadow London, if anyone. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...