Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Falcons GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Serious request: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs18jn-zj0Q

I'd love to know, aside from one deep ball, where all the amazing plays were supposed to originate today with no open receivers. Looked like the absolute most touchdowns he could've thrown today was 2.

I’m going to do my normal all-22 breakdown this week. I’ll post by Thursday 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I’m seeing 2 sacks and those cane at the end whenever they would blitz knowing he had to pass one was an overloaded blitz. 

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Yeah it really wasn’t that bad. We hung around and eventually the 3 turnovers (4 if you count failed 4th down conversion) with 17 points coming from them was too much to overcome. Our defense played much better than expected just ran out of gas at the end.

Basically our rookie QB made a couple rookie mistakes and if he cleans that up (which we all know he can) we will be fine.  I mean our staff addressed the media saying we may start off rough, but will look much better by season’s end. Now we have people writing off Young. Well ok if we are using game 1 as a sample size, AR is injury prone, and Stroud can’t score at this level. I guess they all are busts?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah it really wasn’t that bad. We hung around and eventually the 3 turnovers (4 if you count failed 4th down conversion) with 17 points coming from them was too much to overcome. Our defense played much better than expected just ran out of gas at the end.

Basically our rookie QB made a couple rookie mistakes and if he cleans that up (which we all know he can) we will be fine.  I mean our staff addressed the media saying we may start off rough, but will look much better by season’s end. Now we have people writing off Young. Well ok if we are using game 1 as a sample size, AR is injury prone, and Stroud can’t score at this level. I guess they all are busts?

Don’t forget fields can’t throw the ball, pickett is a bust and burrow is regressing after he got paid.

 

surprised no one is talking about that rams/burns trade as frequently as they were.🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Bears fans have a legitimate right to bitch. Year three of Fields and it looks like the same ol Bears. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I’m seeing 2 sacks and those cane at the end whenever they would blitz knowing he had to pass one was an overloaded blitz. 

The commentators at least twice during said that Atlanta had 3 sacks at that specific point, but they didn't have any, Carolina was the team with 3 sacks. They then did a half-assed correction saying "Atlanta doesn't have 3 sacks, but they do have 2 interceptions." (Classic NFL commentating not giving the Panther's even a crumb.)

Add the two real ones they got towards the end and that may be the source of the "5 sacks" number.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

The commentators at least twice during said that Atlanta had 3 sacks at that specific point, but they didn't have any, Carolina was the team with 3 sacks. They then did a half-assed correction saying "Atlanta doesn't have 3 sacks, but they do have 2 interceptions." (Classic NFL commentating not giving the Panther's even a crumb.)

Add the two real ones they got towards the end and that may be the source of the "5 sacks" number.

Makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Fitts is serious about continuously looking to upgrade this roster, he needs to, right now, sign a short yardage RB and compliment to Hurst.  We have the roster spots.  Wooten was elevated for game day, so we essentially have two available roster spots.

I get the WR aspect, and actually that is priority #1, but there is nothing out there really worth signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, travisura said:

The commentators at least twice during said that Atlanta had 3 sacks at that specific point, but they didn't have any, Carolina was the team with 3 sacks. They then did a half-assed correction saying "Atlanta doesn't have 3 sacks, but they do have 2 interceptions." (Classic NFL commentating not giving the Panther's even a crumb.)

Add the two real ones they got towards the end and that may be the source of the "5 sacks" number.

This. Fugging announcers… should know better than to listen to them. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Gotta disagree here. Not a single thread was created on either of their boards to bench Fields or Jones. They blamed the front office and the OL. 

here, if a WR is covered and the QB throws it away before getting hit, he’s not NFL ready and needs to benched all season

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

we are not even good at over reacting 

There are people pining for the leadership of Marty Hurney right now.

We may have officially reached The Ninth Circle of Dumb 🙄

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
    • Final Avs 9 Wild 6. Defense never entered the building lol.
×
×
  • Create New...