Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Falcons GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or

giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

 

we are not even good at over reacting 

Gotta disagree here. Not a single thread was created on either of their boards to bench Fields or Jones. They blamed the front office and the OL. 

here, if a WR is covered and the QB throws it away before getting hit, he’s not NFL ready and needs to benched all season

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

This place is awful, but so is 15 other team’s message boards. If you want to see fans who are actually doing a good job of a message board meltdown go to the bears or giants message board. It’s 100x more toxic than this place right now 

we are not even good at over reacting 

There are people pining for the leadership of Marty Hurney right now.

We may have officially reached The Ninth Circle of Dumb 🙄

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are people pining for the leadership of Marty Hurney right now.

We may have officially reached The Ninth Circle of Dumb 🙄

I wish Hurney could come in every year just to make a first round selection and then walk out the door after that first round selection not to return back until its time to make the next first round drafty selection. The dude usually drafted pretty well in the first. He sucked at most everything else but first round he was a whiz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I wish Hurney could come in every year just to make a first round selection and then walk out the door after that first round selection not to return back until its time to make the next first round drafty selection. The dude usually drafted pretty well in the first. He sucked at most everything else but first round he was a whiz

Of course he was! We were always picking in the top 10 because of him. Hard to miss when you're picking that high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Of course he was! We were always picking in the top 10 because of him. Hard to miss when you're picking that high.

True for the most part if you leave out guys like Jamarcus Russell and some other top 10 busts. Even his later first round picks turned out pretty well. terrible GM but the guy could scout a first rounder

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

Tell that to Scott Fitterer

Ickey and Derrick Brown have been good??

 

horn is the only one you could arguably call a bad pick, and even then, he showed no issues staying healthy in college. Just bad luck. 
 

there are things to criticize Scott for but i don’t think first round selections are one of them. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Coheed said:

Ickey and Derrick Brown have been good??

 

horn is the only one you could arguably call a bad pick, and even then, he showed no issues staying healthy in college. Just bad luck. 
 

there are things to criticize Scott for but i don’t think first round selections are one of them. 

How could Fitterer have drafted Brown if he was hired 9 months after Brown was drafted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

How could Fitterer have drafted Brown if he was hired 9 months after Brown was drafted?

Okay? The point still stands that the *only* first round pick of Scott’s that could be considered “bad” is Jaycee - and once again it’s due to an issue that never reared its head in college. So of Scott’s three first round picks you have

 

one that looks good and send to be on his way to being a stud (Ickey)

One who’s a great player but hurt too often (Horn)

and one who just played their first game (Bryce)

 

You can be bummed about Jaycee, I am too, but there’s nothing proving Scott is “bad” in the First round. 

 

Edited by Coheed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...