Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Falcons GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, GhostWhispah said:

I know you can't be referring to Bryce cause his processing skills as in making smart decision is thru the charts. Its not hype at all but reality unless you never seen what he has done in Bama making something out of nothing in big time situations. He just need our receivers to get open.

Seems like you rather have kept Sam D with his cannon arm but his so called processing kills as you put it is still one of the worst in the league even after 5 seasons unless passing to ghost is your cup of tea Lol. 

Processing skills on a computer test vs real world game day processing skills. I’ll go with game day and expect Young to improve over time, not impressed with 1st game processing skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

Respect your ratings. As far as the sacks go, I attribute most of it to how long Young held onto the ball.

My QB and all my ratings were just for how they played for this game. I certainly expect Young to get better with more experience and practice, but he needs WR help and the timing was atrocious (half on WR half on Young). 

As was covered it was not 5 sacks. The announcers fugged up. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My grades

QB - D.  Made some nice plays at times, but obviously had some work to do.  

Oline - First half A, second Half C.  Run blocking was great, pass blocking in the second half broke down some, although some of that was on the qb.  

WR's - D, didn't do much.

Defense as a whole, B.  Their first two drives for scores were 17 yards (td) and 5 yards (fg).  When we didn't turn the ball over on our own side of the field, they got zero points for the first 3 quarters.  But we knew they were going to run it, and didn't do much to stop the run.  

Special teams Kicking/coverage was good enough.  Punter was fantastic.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, DavidEng said:

Processing skills on a computer test vs real world game day processing skills. I’ll go with game day and expect Young to improve over time, not impressed with 1st game processing skills.

What do you expect from him when his receivers cannot get any separation to get open. Not his fault his receivers corps are the weakest in the league after trading their true wideout away. Its no different than Minny trading Jefferson to move up in the draft to take a QB. You DO NOT trade your top receiver and not replace him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

My grades

QB - D.  Made some nice plays at times, but obviously had some work to do.  

Oline - First half A, second Half C.  Run blocking was great, pass blocking in the second half broke down some, although some of that was on the qb.  

WR's - D, didn't do much.

Defense as a whole, B.  Their first two drives for scores were 17 yards (td) and 5 yards (fg).  When we didn't turn the ball over on our own side of the field, they got zero points for the first 3 quarters.  But we knew they were going to run it, and didn't do much to stop the run.  

Special teams Kicking/coverage was good enough.  Punter was fantastic.  

So i guess if the receiving group is a D, might as well give the QB the same grade. What was Josh Allen grade last night in your book? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

My grades

QB - D.  Made some nice plays at times, but obviously had some work to do.  

Oline - First half A, second Half C.  Run blocking was great, pass blocking in the second half broke down some, although some of that was on the qb.  

WR's - D, didn't do much.

Defense as a whole, B.  Their first two drives for scores were 17 yards (td) and 5 yards (fg).  When we didn't turn the ball over on our own side of the field, they got zero points for the first 3 quarters.  But we knew they were going to run it, and didn't do much to stop the run.  

Special teams Kicking/coverage was good enough.  Punter was fantastic.  

I can't see giving Bryce a D with this being his first start as a rookie.

I've seen a hell of a lot worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GhostWhispah said:

What do you expect from him when his receivers cannot get any separation to get open. Not his fault his receivers corps are the weakest in the league after trading their true wideout away. Its no different than Minny trading Jefferson to move up in the draft to take a QB. You DO NOT trade your top receiver and not replace him. 

Bryce knows this and tried to force it through anyway. Bad decision. I saw more positive than negative out of him but call it like it is. His mental game is held to a higher standard because he does not have the physical traits to bail him out of bad decisions.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, DavidEng said:

Processing skills on a computer test vs real world game day processing skills. I’ll go with game day and expect Young to improve over time, not impressed with 1st game processing skills.

I was.

Said it elsewhere: These days we have guys who've been in the league for two or three years that still can't consistently go through theie progressions.

Young went through them regularly as a rookie making his first start.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I can't see giving Bryce a D with this being his first start as a rookie.

I've seen a hell of a lot worse.

I am just looking at performance only, not taking being a rookie into account.  He made some mistakes and those mistakes were critical, but I do think he will get better.  At least I hope he will.  

I bet if truth be told, he would probably  give himself worse grades than any of us would.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I am just looking at performance only, not taking being a rookie into account.  He made some mistakes and those mistakes were critical, but I do think he will get better.  At least I hope he will.  

I bet if truth be told, he would probably  give himself worse grades than any of us would.  

I'm sure he would. Most players would.

(outside of guys like Freddie Mitchell, at least) 😕

But I think you have to take the situation into account to give a true grade.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm sure he would. Most players would.

(outside of guys like Freddie Mitchell, at least) 😕

But I think you have to take the situation into account to give a true grade.

Nothing I say or do here has any impact, just my opinion.  And like I said, I expect him to improve.  But this was his first real test, and he didn't do well.  I didn't expect him to do well. 

Fwiw, I don't remember any teacher in school ever taking my situation into account.  If I missed the question, they marked it wrong and told me what I needed to work on.  Which is what I hope the coaching staff is doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Nothing I say or do here has any impact, just my opinion.  And like I said, I expect him to improve.  But this was his first real test, and he didn't do well.  I didn't expect him to do well. 

Fwiw, I don't remember any teacher in school ever taking my situation into account.  If I missed the question, they marked it wrong and told me what I needed to work on.  Which is what I hope the coaching staff is doing. 

Pretty sure you didn't take your school tests with 300 poind men chasing you down trying to hurt you.

(at least I wouldn't think so; your a school may have been different than mine) 😕

Think of it this way now. Would your teacher have evaluated you the same way on your first day of class as they would have your last?

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure you didn't take your school tests with 300 poind men chasing you down trying to hurt you.

(at least I wouldn't think so; your a school may have been different than mine) 😕

Think of it this way now. Would your teacher have evaluated you the same way on your first day of class as they would have your last?

I went thru boot camp and had to take a variety of test there, so there were 200 lb men yelling at me for some of them.

And the answer to the last question is that they evaluate me on whether I got the answer right or not.  The questions might be more difficult as time goes along though.  My guess is that Reich will try to keep things simple for BY at first and make it more complex as time goes along, depending on how quickly he comes along.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...