Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My pleasant suprise of the night? The Schwartz


SCP

Recommended Posts

Let me be the first to apologize to Geoff Schwartz. I thought he was going to get owned like a rented mule. He held is own for the most part and looked a lot better than I thought he would.

The Schwartz

abide.jpg

Geoff_Schwartz1.jpg

I will jock sniff Schwartz since Otah is on IR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On some Vikes boards I checked out last night there was some major complaining about how Schwartz was owning their DE.

Personally my response was more like: "Damn if only Otah had been there we would've had three more yards and a chance to bust one loose."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schwartz had some assignment errors, but he played very well for the most part. That one play with the end-around to Smitty, where Ray Edwards tackled Smitty in the bakcfield.. that was Schwartz' fault.. Smitty looked like he got his bell rung too..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he missed a block on the end around. Those plays are designed to get everyone flowing in one direction to make it look like a run the opposite way, including the offensive line, which in turn makes the end suck down and think "run left". Looked to me like Schwartz did the right thing - make it look like an outside run left, in which case Edwards would be unblocked. Edwards started to suck in, but ended up realizing what was happening and made a disciplined play. Think 'Spoons tackle back in the Super Bowl (going way back here).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the team he was up against, he did well for his debut as a starter. Not too shabby, and Wharton held down the other tackle spot well.

It looked like it was going to be a tough one for them early on, but the tight end help both received seemed to have made a big difference. Moore being able to roll out now and then helped the cause as well.

But the telling thing was the running game. Early on it looked like Double Trouble was In Trouble, but somehow the Big Uglies just got hold of the situation and started opening lanes. I like how they were pointing out Kalil's hard work, centers never get the praise they deserve.

(Of course, that snap snafu... well, let's give him a mulligan.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...