Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What has Scott Fitterer done right?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Ah yes, the ever present "if it doesn't fit my narrative it must be fake" defense 😄

Quick Hint: We actually did get the number one guy on our board, no PR necessary.

Look dude, I get that you like to defend stupid takes, and I'm indulging you on that here, but there comes a point where you start to sound like you're believing your own bullsh-t. And that's when you actually start to look dumb.

FYI: You're past that point now.

lol.  your entire argument boils down to whatever Carolina is selling....is the truth.  Again, have at it. 

32 teams have gone out there for decades and sold to there fanbase that everyone agrees and they landed exactly who they wanted.  Their entire board worked out perfectly.   Everyone agreed on it all too.  Perfection in motion lol.  Believe it.  I don't care.  I just don't. 

I think NFL teams are often dysfunctional.  They lie to the public.  They lie to reporters.  They to everyone.  And they are mom and pop shops largely run by egocentric billionaires.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I didn't skip over that part.  You skipped to after the draft.  When they were then in sell our decision to the fanbase mode.  Which you keep acting like is the ultimate truth that everyone just has to believe.  But those sales jobs are always the same.  Doesn't matter the team. 

Quick tip regarding sales jobs:

You're not doing a great job with yours 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

lol.  your entire argument boils down to whatever Carolina is selling....is the truth.  Again, have at it. 

32 teams have gone out there for decades and sold to there fanbase that everyone agrees and they landed exactly who they wanted.  Their entire board worked out perfectly.   Everyone agreed on it all too.  Perfection in motion lol.  Believe it.  I don't care.  I just don't.  

No, but even if that was my thing, I'd probably take that over your position of "whatever I make up is true regardless of what anybody with actual knowledge says the facts are" 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I'm pretty sure Young was the top QB on most draft boards.  It's really not surprising he is the one we went with and I was originally in favor of Stroud.  

Same.

Hell, for a time I was hoping the stuff we were hearing about how much the coaches and front office loved Young was just smoke because I prefer it's Stroud.

It wasn't, and here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CRA said:

Ok, so in his third year….his 2nd and 3rd best adds are average starting lineman.   His best add is LB. 

I mean, that sort of sums up the Panthers in an offensive league. 

An “average” offensive line is far better than the turnstiles we had 3 years ago. We need to put the players around our quarterback. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jb2288 said:

Why does this matter? In either scenario we wouldn’t have a chance to really contend until year 3. Seems better to have the QB with one extra year under his belt than the skill players. QBs that make it usually make their big leaps after year 1

Because by waiting on the qb, we could have kept DJ AND drafted a skill player too. Pick up the qb in '24 and we are in pretty good shape. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I swear this conversation happens every year.  I'm not saying it's not the case, but there is a lot of football left and who knows who returns and who doesn't .  The class with Lance, Fields, Mac, Mond, and Lawrence doesn't look nearly as strong as anticipated and this past class was suppose to be the next big one but now it's next year's class.  This narrative will always happen to get people excited about college football and interested in the draft. 

Among the talking heads, sure it happens every year.  I've been in this boat for only two seasons prior.  I was willing to give Teddy a shot was lukewarm about Darnold.  When we brought in Sam is when I started sniffing around drafting a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...