Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

USFL and XFL to merge


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Uh let me think maybe it’s the adult kickball league 

You don't have to be an asshole.  And no, there is no official NFL farm system.  I assume you're talking about college football, but that is not the same.  MLB has the minor leagues, NBA has the G League.  What does the NFL have?  All the other sports also play in college, but then they also have legit professional farm systems. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

You don't have to be an asshole.  And no, there is no official NFL farm system.  I assume you're talking about college football, but that is not the same.  MLB has the minor leagues, NBA has the G League.  What does the NFL have?  All the other sports also play in college, but then they also have legit professional farm systems. 

I'm not sure it'll ever really work to have an official farm system for pro football.  For instance, guys in baseball get drafted out of high school to play single and double A ball.  By the time a prospect is in his mid 20s, you typically know if they're going to make it in the majors or not.  Thats essentially the same age football players come out of college.  Combine that with the fact that football players have the shortest career by far, and I'm not sure there's a big use case for a traditional farm system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'm not sure it'll ever really work to have an official farm system for pro football.  For instance, guys in baseball get drafted out of high school to play single and double A ball.  By the time a prospect is in his mid 20s, you typically know if they're going to make it in the majors or not.  Thats essentially the same age football players come out of college.  Combine that with the fact that football players have the shortest career by far, and I'm not sure there's a big use case for a traditional farm system.

You're probably right, however I know that this XFL, USFL poo ain't it.  It never works, has never worked, and will never work.  How many 1 off seasons have these leagues had, and then they fold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wishing it the best. Birmingham Stallion games are half entertaining and good atmosphere. For only $10 for General Admission not much better to do for a few hours in the area. It just looks bad when there are 17,000 fans there playing in the brand new UAB stadium that holds 45,000. (Its half empty when they play too)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PappyMay said:

I'm wishing it the best. Birmingham Stallion games are half entertaining and good atmosphere. For only $10 for General Admission not much better to do for a few hours in the area. It just looks bad when there are 17,000 fans there playing in the brand new UAB stadium that holds 45,000. (Its half empty when they play too)

Im shocked any of those games can pull in 17,000 people.  Thats actually not half bad.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it! The only knock I had on watching the XFL was the limited competition pool. Immediately doubling the size of the league already makes it more interesting.

Smaller stadiums, good atmosphere, I think there's definitely an appetite for it. Glorified farm system or not, I just like watching football in the offseason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO this new league has an opportunity to prosper. First of all because all the betting junkies can help keep it alive when the NFL is in its offseason, and two it can be an affordable event for people to attend. 

If they play their marketing right, it can turn into something nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If players could have an option of a developmental league and skip the college thing all together it could potentially work. Also would get rid of the BS academic qualifications we all know are a joke anyway. If a player is balling out in the developmental league, he could just be signed by a team and not have to go through the draft process, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If players could have an option of a developmental league and skip the college thing all together it could potentially work. Also would get rid of the BS academic qualifications we all know are a joke anyway. If a player is balling out in the developmental league, he could just be signed by a team and not have to go through the draft process, etc. 

most SEC players  already are “skipping college” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...