Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith Sr. Wants You All To Relax


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, frankw said:

I've acknowledged there are multiple problems. Bryce Young however is at the center of those problems. He's got to adjust and play differently and the coaching staff has to put him in that position. But until proven otherwise defenses are simply not going to be scared of his arm. I don't like it. It's really depressing. But that's the rub.

Reich is the center of the problem. For the life of me, I don't get how you guys think that his arm just suddenly disappeared just because he got to the pros. Anyone intimating that he has a noodle arm is simply not interested in truth because that wasn't on his college tape, nor is it on any scouting report.

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Reich is the center of the problem. For the life of me, I don't get how you guys think that his arm just suddenly disappeared just because he got to the pros. Anyone intimating that he has a noodle arm is simply not interested in truth because that wasn't on his college tape, nor is it on any scouting report.

I don't think he has a noodle arm but he does definitely look small and lacks physicality out there the other top 2 QB's have shown in this league. You simply cannot deny that unless you are engaging in self deception. It's up to Bryce to make defensive coordinators and defensive backs believe he can and will beat them deep. Nobody cares about college anymore.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

So Smith tells fans to relax and have some patience and suddenly he is Tepper's minion. 

JT does a film review and he doesn't always know what he is talking about (unless it's any other QB).  

We have someone post a play by play review with video evidence and shows some positivity and they are just trying to desperately salvage this situation. 

Regardless there is some progressions.  Game 1- 52.6% 3.8 yards avg with 146 total yards.  Game 2- 66.7% 4.6 avg 153 total yards.  Game 3- 78.1% 6.4 avg 204 total yards.  Ratings jumps from 48.8 to 87.1 to 93.2.  Despite this terrible OG play and conservative play calling Young IS progressing.

by week 10, it'll be fun to call these guys out for back peddling 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Reich is the center of the problem. For the life of me, I don't get how you guys think that his arm just suddenly disappeared just because he got to the pros. Anyone intimating that he has a noodle arm is simply not interested in truth because that wasn't on his college tape, nor is it on any scouting report.

Plenty of us talked about arm talent concerns pre-draft. Why did the offense have a credible downfield attack with Dalton?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Plenty of us talked about arm talent concerns pre-draft. Why did the offense have a credible downfield attack with Dalton?

Considering we threw the ball 58 times I'm sure a handful of those involved some downfield playcalls.

Since you keep beating this point to death, can you point out how many downfield routes were run on Sunday? It would help drive whatever point you are trying to make home.

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Considering we threw the ball 58 times I'm sure a handful of those involved some downfield playcalls.

Since you keep beating this point to death, can you point out how many downfield routes were run on Sunday? It would help drive whatever point you are trying to make home.

Two that instantly come to mind 

1. the seam ball Young should’ve thrown for a TD to Theilen

2. the ball he threw just behind Theilen in the middle of the field, Chark was running deep down the middle. Had he waited a split second longer he would’ve seen Chark turn around 

Lastly it’s hard to really know because our super processor was busy getting fooled by Flores and checking into a screen play 95% of the time 

I’m about to watch the all 22. Not sure how much I’ll be able to sit through but we’ll see

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Considering we threw the ball 58 times I'm sure a handful of those involved some downfield playcalls.

Since you keep beating this point to death, can you point out how many downfield routes were run on Sunday? It would help drive whatever point you are trying to make home.

No clue. I'm not watching the all 22. All I know is that we threw downfield with Dalton more on one game than we have in three with Bryce and we did it effectively. And all I'm asking is why y'all think that might be? The goalposts of excuses keep moving but our offense keeps looking the same with Bryce.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Two that instantly come to mind 

1. the seam ball Young should’ve thrown for a TD to Theilen

2. the ball he threw just behind Theilen in the middle of the field, Chark was running deep down the middle. Had he waited a split second longer he would’ve seen Chark turn around 

Lastly it’s hard to really know because our super processor was busy getting fooled by Flores and checking into a screen play 95% of the time 

I’m about to watch the all 22. Not sure how much I’ll be able to sit through but we’ll see

It would be good to see your takes on what went wrong versus @TheCasillason what went right in terms of Bryce. I thought Sunday was an improvement over weeks 1 and 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No clue. I'm not watching the all 22. All I know is that we threw downfield with Dalton more on one game than we have in three with Bryce and we did it effectively. And all I'm asking is why y'all think that might be? The goalposts of excuses keep moving but our offense keeps looking the same with Bryce.

I mean, the goalposts don't need to move very far. We have no running game and a guy calling plays who doesn't believe in him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No clue. I'm not watching the all 22. All I know is that we threw downfield with Dalton more on one game than we have in three with Bryce and we did it effectively. And all I'm asking is why y'all think that might be? The goalposts of excuses keep moving but our offense keeps looking the same with Bryce.

It's interesting also comparing Bruce's 3 passing charts - the passes have been getting closer and closer to the LOS each game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

2. the ball he threw just behind Theilen in the middle of the field, Chark was running deep down the middle. Had he waited a split second longer he would’ve seen Chark turn around 

that was a decoy to bring the safeties high so they couldnt sit on the crossing route. Look how Chark runs at about 75-80% speed and just moves left and right between both safeties as he goes up field. He even flips his head over his shoulder to see if the ball had been thrown yet... he was not an intended target on that play.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Reich is the center of the problem. For the life of me, I don't get how you guys think that his arm just suddenly disappeared just because he got to the pros. Anyone intimating that he has a noodle arm is simply not interested in truth because that wasn't on his college tape, nor is it on any scouting report.

You cant read well huh 

 

Screenshot_20231004_140031_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...