Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Crazy what you can do with AI now


RelaxImaPro
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Cam's New Arm said:

I feel like Skynet is inevitable.

The Terminator is such a damn good film. Way ahead of it's time. I miss great sci-fi movies with practical effects. CGI looks nice for creating fantasy worlds but it's hollow and way overdone now. I've tried to like the Avatar movies but they have no rewatch appeal for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

The Terminator is such a damn good film. Way ahead of it's time. I miss great sci-fi movies with practical effects. CGI looks nice for creating fantasy worlds but it's hollow and way overdone now. I've tried to like the Avatar movies but they have no rewatch appeal for me.

There's a good doc about the guy/guys that pioneered the CGI for Jurassic Park and Terminator 2, and then of course everyone in Hollywood had to copy and cheapen it. Free on Tubi

https://tubitv.com/movies/100002720/jurassic-punk?start=true&tracking=google-feed&utm_source=google-feed

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

There's a good doc about the guy/guys that pioneered the CGI for Jurassic Park and Terminator 2, and then of course everyone in Hollywood had to copy and cheapen it. Free on Tubi

https://tubitv.com/movies/100002720/jurassic-punk?start=true&tracking=google-feed&utm_source=google-feed

Thanks I'll definitely give that a look. "The movies that made us" on Netflix had an episode about Jurrasic Park that delved into this subject some too. Those guys and all others who created practical effects through the 80's and 90's are true artists and legends. One of the scariest movies I've ever seen is the original "The Thing". Still holds up damn good 40 years later.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

The refs rigged the game for Manning’s retirement party. I was terrified of that match up the two weeks before because I knew the league wouldn’t let us compete fairly.

Manning basically got benched in the 3rd quarter, he was about to put the game in jeopardy for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Waldo said:

Big sad. I miss thinking we could win any game on gameday.

The AI stuff is insane and set to get out of control. I have no idea how long it will take but someone will be using made up AI stuff on the site sooner than later in not entertaining ways.

lol I know that it can get to a level where it could read our responses, and come up with an articulate (and fact based) response based on data. You could even program it to take on our style of writing so that it blends in.  It's pretty wild.

That picture is amazing, it did have 6 fingers though. But I'm sure in time they'll correct the flaws.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:

lol I know that it can get to a level where it could read our responses, and come up with an articulate (and fact based) response based on data. You could even program it to take on our style of writing so that it blends in.  It's pretty wild.

That picture is amazing, it did have 6 fingers though. But I'm sure in time they'll correct the flaws.

The finger thing is fine with me. When the perfect it is what is going to be so much worse.

The writen stuff is as imperfect but also crazy. I thought the crap the Panthers bot spews might be that given the quality of it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Waldo said:

The finger thing is fine with me. When the perfect it is what is going to be so much worse.

The writen stuff is as imperfect but also crazy. I thought the crap the Panthers bot spews might be that given the quality of it.

 

Trust me I mentioned the 6 fingers, but I'm not one of those people that thinks "haha it has 6 fingers, AI is so dumb".  Right now it's in such early stages that I can't even fathom what it will be in even 5 years.

The written things will be so hard to tell at some point. It'll have enough data, and opinions on Bryce, Reich and Tepper to form a cohesive counter-argument...and have enough wit to throw in a yo mamma joke if it wants lol. 

Don't mean to turn this into a tech talk but yeah it's all crazy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:

Trust me I mentioned the 6 fingers, but I'm not one of those people that thinks "haha it has 6 fingers, AI is so dumb".  Right now it's in such early stages that I can't even fathom what it will be in even 5 years.

The written things will be so hard to tell at some point. It'll have enough data, and opinions on Bryce, Reich and Tepper to form a cohesive counter-argument...and have enough wit to throw in a yo mamma joke if it wants lol. 

Don't mean to turn this into a tech talk but yeah it's all crazy.

Sorry I was tired typing. I am of the same mind. I just meant that I enjoy the fact it hasn't progressed to the next level because it looks like a giant headache in that stage on so many levels. Like why even argue if it's just a computer programed to do so forever? Both the written and visual stuff is really impressive even given their imperfections. I actually enjoy the spoof stuff from the failures. The stuff 5 years from now? That is way too powerful of a tool for me to trust what can be done with it when you look at what is being done with other powerful tech tools out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What is your personal grade of this draft?
    • No disrespect intended, but you act as if we are supposed to value your opinion when it is all emotion and no fact.  The roster (I assume you mean offense) is "still trash" because someone who just signed up for the Huddle has declared it to be so?   Buhahaha.  ha.  Let me show you how FACTS work, and why emotional, unsupported opinions don't carry much weight: TE: Upgraded through the draft.  Sanders is a weapon that should improve the passing game and give Bryce an outlet he did not have last year. RB:  We just drafted the best RB in college football, one who can protect the passer, run the ball, and catch the ball like nobody else on the roster.  His knee will be cleared July 1.  OL: We just signed two of the best guards in football.  that is what Payton did to protect Brees.  Ekwonu has the skill and talent, he was simply missing technique.  We got him a better OL coach.  Center?  Bozeman was ineffective last year.  Corbett is an established veteran OLman.  It seems we are much better up front. WR:  We added a guy who gets open and has averaged about 900 yards per game as a #2 in Pittsburgh with an inferior QB there.  Thielen was a 1000 yard WR last season.  We have not had a #2 like XL, with his YAC capabilities and ability to catch contested passes.  In other words, the X is much better; the Z will be replaced with a stud WR, and the veteran slot will probably not be the #1 WR in 2024--he should be the #2 or even #3 most effective WR.  The 2023 Z WR, who had 418 yards and was showing signs of improving, will not be a starter in 2024.   As much as the OL has improved, we improved the weapons.  QB:  All of these additions increase levels of protection for the QB that he did not have last year and they give him more powerful weapons that he did not have last year.  Young will not be a rookie getting hammered trying to throw to people who are not separating.  This should make him improved.  How much? remains to be seen. Now keep in mind that we did this by not reworking contracts and kicking the can down the road.  We did not have a first rounder in the draft.  We added a second rounder to next year's draft.  We also addressed needs on defense as well, adding established DL, OLBs, ILBs, and DBs.  We get 2 first round pick starters who were injured most of the season back on that defense.  Yes, we lost Burns, Luvu, and a few others, but while being good players, they were either asking for too much money or they were not great fits for the system.  So the D should be better as well. That is not trash.   
×
×
  • Create New...