Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Orlovsky with a message to the Huddle


thebdawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, frankw said:

Honestly I assumed and part of me hoped Dalton would look like total asswater against Seattle. Because it would drive home the notion that our scheme and coaching are horrific and therefore absolve Bryce Young to some degree of this debacle. Andy surprised me though and in turn kicked up my concern level for our #1 pick a few more notches. I think our offense is certainly not good but I think the people saying our receiving weapons are completely awful are overstating their case to a degree to protect Bryce. There's as much of that going on as there is a certain level of overreaction to every little thing Bryce does. Both things can be true. As I said though I welcome the game where Bryce Young truly arrives. Hopefully that day comes before we've all eaten each other.

They looked better against Seattle because Reich altered the playbook per Dalton's request. Reich confirmed that in one of his press conferences. It seems a bit harsh to criticise Young for our limited playcalling in games he has started if it's by design.

Edited by Billy Goat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, frankw said:

Others are creating a narrative though. We are 0-5. Our offense has looked awful for a number of reasons but the truth of the matter is whether it is him being held back or the coaching staff being inept the best our passing game has looked was with Andy Dalton on the road.

You could easily make the case that the Colts look better with Minshew under center vs. Richardson.  They're 3-0 with Minshew starting/playing the majority of the game (due to Richardson injuries) and 0-2 with Richardson taking the majority of the snaps.  That's not a knock against Richardson...he has obviously looked promising.  That's an example of a vet outperforming a rookie but a team knowing that it's in their best interest as a franchise to put their rookie out there to take his lumps rather than "who looks better right now".  I doubt anyone in the Colts organization is surprised that Minshew is the more effective passer of the two, 5 games into Richardson's young career.

I know I know, "Steph Curry of the NFL" "Drew Brees Jr." "Most pro ready QB" etc. etc. but remove all the off-the-field hype and fluff and noise about Bryce and allow him to simply be a rookie playing the hardest position in the NFL.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

You could easily make the case that the Colts look better with Minshew under center vs. Richardson.  They're 3-0 with Minshew starting/playing the majority of the game (due to Richardson injuries) and 0-2 with Richardson taking the majority of the snaps.  That's not a knock against Richardson...he has obviously looked promising.  That's an example of a vet outperforming a rookie but a team knowing that it's in their best interest as a franchise to put their rookie out there to take his lumps rather than "who looks better right now".  I doubt anyone in the Colts organization is surprised that Minshew is the more effective passer of the two, 5 games into Richardson's young career.

I know I know, "Steph Curry of the NFL" "Drew Brees Jr." "Most pro ready QB" etc. etc. but remove all the off-the-field hype and fluff and noise about Bryce and allow him to simply be a rookie playing the hardest position in the NFL.

Before the draft just about everyone agreed Richardson would need the most time to develop out of all the rookie QB's. Now apparently that's actually Bryce Young. Meanwhile Stroud was apparently barely cognitively functional enough to operate a motor vehicle and he wasn't enough of a leader.

As far as this veteran grit I'm hearing about. The truth of the matter is CJ Stroud has looked as good or better than any veteran QB and he's only played a handful of games.

All this goes to show you that it's a good rule of thumb to trust your instincts and not fall into the traps created by media hype within the draft process. Many people here clearly fell into those traps. Now they want to get angry when faced with the harsh reality we are in. Well that's too bad. We'll see how it goes though. Nowhere to go but up from here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, frankw said:

Before the draft just about everyone agreed Richardson would need the most time to develop out of all the rookie QB's. Now apparently that's actually Bryce Young. Meanwhile Stroud was apparently barely cognitively functional enough to operate a motor vehicle and he wasn't enough of a leader.

As far as this veteran grit I'm hearing about. The truth of the matter is CJ Stroud has looked as good or better than any veteran QB and he's only played a handful of games.

All this goes to show you that it's a good rule of thumb to trust your instincts and not fall into the traps created by media hype within the draft process. Many people here clearly fell into those traps. Now they want to get angry when faced with the harsh reality we are in. Well that's too bad. We'll see how it goes though. Nowhere to go but up from here.

Well we're just getting bogged down by that outside noise/chatter again.  If you're not able to move past the pre-draft stuff, that's fine, but it's just wholly unproductive...which is why I couldn't care less about discussing stuff from 6+ months ago.  I'm more interested in the current and future state of the Panthers rather than constantly living in the past, which is why my posts revolve around evaluating Bryce on his own merits (because he's our QB) and his prospects for success as a potential franchise QB.  Rather than what so-and-so said before the draft and how other teams' QBs are looking.

I can't help but roll my eyes a little because if the team does something that you agree with, then to the crowd who disagreed with that move, your advice to them is "look, what's done is done.  Move on...no point in arguing about it".  The big examples being the CMC trade and the Burns non-trade last year - you were a big supporter of trading CMC and keeping Burns.  So people who wanted to keep CMC and trade Burns and would complain about it over and over, you'd tell them there's no point in complaining about it ad nauseum.  That Frank I can at least empathize with.  But the other Frank...oh boy...god forbid the Panthers do something he disagrees with, because the rest of us have to hear about it for months and months and months, if not years.  That poor horse is getting beaten to a bloody pulp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TN05 said:

Does Bryce young look like a first round pick right now, let alone somebody worth two #1 picks and DJ Moore?

100% he looks like a rookie QB on a bad offense. He doesn’t look incapable.

That trade wasn’t made to make the Panthers Super Bowl contenders this year. It’s about the long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

You could easily make the case that the Colts look better with Minshew under center vs. Richardson.  They're 3-0 with Minshew starting/playing the majority of the game (due to Richardson injuries) and 0-2 with Richardson taking the majority of the snaps.  That's not a knock against Richardson...he has obviously looked promising.  That's an example of a vet outperforming a rookie but a team knowing that it's in their best interest as a franchise to put their rookie out there to take his lumps rather than "who looks better right now".  I doubt anyone in the Colts organization is surprised that Minshew is the more effective passer of the two, 5 games into Richardson's young career.

I know I know, "Steph Curry of the NFL" "Drew Brees Jr." "Most pro ready QB" etc. etc. but remove all the off-the-field hype and fluff and noise about Bryce and allow him to simply be a rookie playing the hardest position in the NFL.

They 100% look better with Minshew. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Glass houses and all. I find the people who are the most adamant about this type of thing tend to have the most to hide. Careful buddy. 
    • Also, wanted to point out, all 3 of the Pivot guys I respect and appreciate tremendously.  I know RC only had 1 pro bowl, but I loved his game.  He was tough as nails and played with a ton of heart and grit.  He was trying to knock people out, but was also super cerebral.  Fred is obviously a hall of famer and just as tough. Channing made the most of what he had and was hard-nosed as well.  And yet, all three of them let Steve slide on a ton of poo in this interview.  They actually cowered in several moments and I don’t like that at all.  Because for all the things I mentioned in my initial post in this thread, them not trying to reel him back in or hold his feet to the fire on certain bullshit, and feels gross.  Yall were all on the same competitive level as athletes, and yet, yall just let him skate on poo like talking about invoking using a gun on someone, laughing off how he essentially ended two teammates’ careers by BULLYING them and then co-signing it, and letting him completely sidestep accountability about his affair.  I get it, because apparently he invited you to his home to do the interview, but either talk some real poo or don’t do the interview at all.  This was some real softball poo.
    • This season’s leader, Daniel Jones, is averaging 265.9 yards per game, that would rank 12th in 2015. Even going back to 2020, he would rank 10th in passing yards. So it does appear that passing yards is down, but is that because they aren’t as good? Possibly, but we were spoilt in recent years when we had Brady, Peyton, Brees, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, Rivers, Ryan, Stafford (etc). As crops of QBs go, it was an amazing era to watch and most will end up in the Hall of Fame. I’m not convinced you we could list as many potential Hall of Fame QBs from the current crop. Will it go pass heavy again? I think there’s a good chance that it will, but it will require QBs that can consistently air the ball out in the frequency we saw in the 00s and 10s. I think currently coaches are favouring a more balanced approach, if not favouring a strong running game. 
×
×
  • Create New...