Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who really wanted Young?


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, mav1234 said:

I think this is true, but debate between him and Stroud wasn't "a huge QB vs a tiny QB", it was "an average to slightly smaller-sized QB to a tiny QB."... I don't think Stroud's size was a concern (dude was pretty lanky and not that tall, but the NFL fixes some of that), but nor was it a plus (as AR's was). And the fear of OSU QBs was very strong... everyone pointed to the WRs.

I think it's easy to watch BY play in college and see how his movement and escapability could become a great asset.  He's actually shown glimpses of that already. But he's just so damn small, you have to wonder if he can succeed with his physical tools. Ultimately only so much of this game is mental...

I think it was also very easy to watch Young play in College and see how his movement and escapability wouldn't translate to the NFL. Which it hasn't. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Green-Ghost said:

I wanted a winning team.  I am sure I am not alone.

I think people are mis judging college recruits.  They look at that shiny new college QB and think, “We must tank and get that shiny QB.”   However, I don’t think they understand the difference between the NCAA and the NFL.

I was a little bit concerned about Bryce Young because he played for a powerful Alabama team.  How much did Bryce contribute to making Alabama, a powerful team.  Alabama was a powerhouse before BY and may still be a powerhouse after BY.

the decision has been made and BY is the QB.  I wish I saw more posts asking, how can we make this work.  However, after just two games, I saw posts which read, “Let’s fire this person, lets loose the rest of the games so we can draft the next star College QB.”   How can you win if you are constantly tearing your favorite team apart?

My pet peeve is, there are tow many people who want to tank an get a perfect draft pick.  1st Tanking is cheating and dishonest.  2nd Any draft pick is not a sure bet.  However, if I was betting, who is the best QB, from that draft class, I would have chosen Bryce Young.

let’s keep the faith.
 

PS.  Does anyone think we should fire the Water person?

To me it was always a big red flag that the consensus #1 overall pick and Heisman winner never won a National Championship as a starter at Alabama - in an age where only Alabama, Georgia and Ohio St could realistically compete for one. 

That consistently got brushed over - in fact people spoke about his poor supporting cast in his Junior year. At Alabama. Nuts. 

 

I don't think there's much of a team to tear apart - we blood and guts'd our way to 7 wins last year, but that was about the ceiling of that roster. A new GM, given license, would obliterate this roster - there's very few 'good' NFL players on it and essentially no 'elite' ones. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Varking said:

4-8. But when AR is in there he’s looked like a more confident passer than Bryce. He’s definitely flashed with some incredible wow throws in his short time playing. They should probably run him less going forward considering Moss and Taylor are both good. 

Well and considering the NFL is teeing off on him like they used to tee off on Newton.

Someone put it succinctly last week - Newton used to deliver punishment, Richardson receives it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

Seeing how bad this coaching staff is we should’ve just rolled with Corral and he would’ve led us to Williams or Maye

Much like we should’ve never signed Teddy and we would’ve possibly landed Lawrence. Although I think we would’ve ended up with Wilson since the Jags only won 1 game that season 

If we landed Lawrence this fan base would have poo all over him for his rookie year. He went 3-14 had 12 tds and 17 ints with virtually the same weapons Bryce has now. He also started 0-5 with his 1st win coming in week 6 against who? IF you guessed the Dolphins you'd be correct! Maybe it's a sign that a major upset is on the horizon

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

If we landed Lawrence this fan base would have poo all over him for his rookie year. He went 3-14 had 12 tds and 17 ints with virtually the same weapons Bryce has now. He also started 0-5 with his 1st win coming in week 6 against who? IF you guessed the Dolphins you'd be correct! Maybe it's a sign that a major upset is on the horizon

lol. Remind me Sunday night

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MechaZain said:

I agree but having a preference is not an unusual level of involvement for an owner with the #1 pick to me, let alone one whose team had gave up their biggest star to get there. It's certainly not the gun to Frank's head being depicted around here. If he went against own judgement to kiss the boss's ass that's his own damn fault. End of the day they all signed off on Bryce and have to own that.

100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

If we landed Lawrence this fan base would have poo all over him for his rookie year. He went 3-14 had 12 tds and 17 ints with virtually the same weapons Bryce has now. He also started 0-5 with his 1st win coming in week 6 against who? IF you guessed the Dolphins you'd be correct! Maybe it's a sign that a major upset is on the horizon

If the Panthers somehow upset the Dolphins, it would top the App State vs. Michigan upset in 2007 because we don't even look like we belong in the same league

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing Young to Lawrence and not seeing how poorly Young matches up to Lawrence is beyond hilarious. Maybe use someone in a closer skill set? Ohh but that would just prove the point of his lack of ability. This is a fun game and thanks for the laughs. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

Comparing Young to Lawrence and not seeing how poorly Young matches up to Lawrence is beyond hilarious. Maybe use someone in a closer skill set? Ohh but that would just prove the point of his lack of ability. This is a fun game and thanks for the laughs. 

It's terrifying, isn't it?

Rather than shooting for the moon with the 'massive' project in Richardson, or going the safe route with Stroud, they doubled down on Young's 'processor' being able to overcome his significant physical limitations... and now we hear they're dialling back what they ask him to do mentally.

Everybody is getting fired at the end of the season, imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I think it was also very easy to watch Young play in College and see how his movement and escapability wouldn't translate to the NFL. Which it hasn't. 

Agreed. I was listening to someone's stream or live on day and they said that they pretty much see bryce as a smarter smaller johhny manziel in college. And i had to agree with that when i really thought about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

It's terrifying, isn't it?

Rather than shooting for the moon with the 'massive' project in Richardson, or going the safe route with Stroud, they doubled down on Young's 'processor' being able to overcome his significant physical limitations... and now we hear they're dialling back what they ask him to do mentally.

Everybody is getting fired at the end of the season, imo. 

His mental ability was supposed to carry him but now that is in doubt too? 

It's a bad situation but it's been brought up here multiple times that his part in it isn't great either. Yes he is a rookie but he is also showing so little. I have zero issues with hope but ignoring that stuff and comparing him to Brees or Rodgers or Lawrence is just ayahuasca level tripping. He can't even compare to Stroud well for fugs sake. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

Comparing Young to Lawrence and not seeing how poorly Young matches up to Lawrence is beyond hilarious. Maybe use someone in a closer skill set? Ohh but that would just prove the point of his lack of ability. This is a fun game and thanks for the laughs. 

Yep every high drafted QB who has a bad rookie season is given the “well Peyton Manning threw 28 interceptions his rookie year” pass

Peyton also threw for over 300 yards in 2 of his first 4 games because he was actually throwing the damn ball downfield. There’s a massive difference there. 

We hear this excuse all the time. Heard it for Sam Darnold. Zach Wilson. Bryce hasn’t sniffed 300 yards yet. The 3 touchdown game was nice. But until they open it up and we start seeing him get aggressive he’s looking more like those other guys than Manning/Lawrence 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yep every high drafted QB who has a bad rookie season is given the “well Peyton Manning threw 28 interceptions his rookie year” pass

Peyton also threw for over 300 yards in 2 of his first 4 games because he was actually throwing the damn ball downfield. There’s a massive difference there. 

We hear this excuse all the time. Heard it for Sam Darnold. Zach Wilson. Bryce hasn’t sniffed 300 yards yet. The 3 touchdown game was nice. But until they open it up and we start seeing him get aggressive he’s looking more like those other guys than Manning/Lawrence 

I went and watched the long video of Manning's rookie year wondering if I was being too harsh on Bryce, all of the TDs and Ints. He was slinging it and also he was reading the line, that was a rookie that made me say holy crap this guy is going to be a baller. Lots of mistakes but right back out there slinging it. It wasn't close to what we have seen from Bryce on any level. 

I think you hit the nail on the head. Same noise and same product but this time it will be different...I just don't believe that and he hasn't done a thing to change my mind. 

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...