Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?


Shotgun
 Share

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?  

176 members have voted

  1. 1. If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?

    • #1
      24
    • #2-#5
      70
    • Not in the top 10
      35
    • Not in the first round
      47


Recommended Posts

If we are basing this off of long term potential and what they have shown for 6 weeks obviously Stroud goes 1, Jalen Carter goes much higher but Richardson needs reps and he might be out for the year. So wasted first season. So after Stroud are you gambling on your coaching staff being able to develop Bryce better than Carolina or are you picking Levis? I think Bryce still is the second off the board. 
 

Texans could be thinking “if we did this much with CJ let’s see what we can do with somebody more pro ready”. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Yes, but after seeing him play for 6 weeks in the NFL has his stock gone up or down? 

On the outside I would guess it has dropped, but people smarter than us are able to separate the player from the situation.  I'd say he is still a first rounder but who knows exactly where he falls.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Varking said:

If we are basing this off of long term potential and what they have shown for 6 weeks obviously Stroud goes 1, Jalen Carter goes much higher but Richardson needs reps and he might be out for the year. So wasted first season. So after Stroud are you gambling on your coaching staff being able to develop Bryce better than Carolina or are you picking Levis? I think Bryce still is the second off the board. 
 

Texans could be thinking “if we did this much with CJ let’s see what we can do with somebody more pro ready”. 

My concern for AR was always that he was going to try and be another Cam/Allen style of QB and run over defenders. Steichen better get a grip on that part of his game or he's going to be out a promising prospect if this keeps up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

He’d go second overall. He was the most pro ready QB in the draft per the draft experts so if we don’t take him 1, he goes 2. 

If there was a re draft, I think Chicago takes Stroud #1. I'm not sure what the Texans do but I doubt they take Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, frankw said:

Say what you want about the Bears and their mismanagement over the years but they sniffed around Bryce Young and decided they didn't need the pick if he was the top option.  Like it or not so far they have not been wrong in that assessment.

They also could have had Stroud/Richardson. Bryce had nothing to do with it; they chose Justin Fields over all of the QBs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Agreed, just showing they were high on him.

one report from glazier had that.  I think if they wanted it the bears would have given it and then swapped again with us to 9.  And if you believe that report then you have to believe that teams totally had him off the draft boards.  If houston was in love with young he would be a texan today

 

Nobody knows how the draft would have gone down.  Someone always falls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

one report from glazier had that.  I think if they wanted it the bears would have given it and then swapped again with us to 9.  And if you believe that report then you have to believe that teams totally had him off the draft boards.  If houston was in love with young he would be a texan today

 

Nobody knows how the draft would have gone down.  Someone always falls. 

https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/2023-nfl-draft-adam-schefter-calls-bryce-youngs-texans-visit-a-waste/

“I think Bryce Young is going to be the No. 1 pick. [The Texans] are not going to have a chance to take the guy that, I think, they would have liked to have taken.

Schefter also thinks they wanted him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

https://nypost.com/2023/04/13/2023-nfl-draft-adam-schefter-calls-bryce-youngs-texans-visit-a-waste/

“I think Bryce Young is going to be the No. 1 pick. [The Texans] are not going to have a chance to take the guy that, I think, they would have liked to have taken.

Schefter also thinks they wanted him.

thats cool, but again nobody knows how it would have played out, someone always falls

 

I can give you the list but you get the point.  I think if texans were in love with young as you are saying then they could have simply flipped with the bears and then bears flipping again with us

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

thats cool, but again nobody knows how it would have played out, someone always falls

 

I can give you the list but you get the point.  I think if texans were in love with young as you are saying then they could have simply flipped with the bears and then bears flipping again with us

I don't think they were "in love" with him.  I think he was their preference, but they weren't willing to part with what we did for him.  DJ Moore on a decent contract was a big selling point for the Bears.  At one point they mentioned the number 2 pick was for sale, but again who knows what is true or not.

Also I don't doubt teams had Young off their boards.  Any team wanting to have their QB under center most of the time or use their QB as a runner shouldn't consider Young.  I just don't think the Texans were one of those teams.  Shefter and Glazer are pretty solid sources IMO.  I don't see one that says the Texans never had Young on their board?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have passed on QBs all together this draft because I saw this train wreck coming.  Admittedly, it's even worse than I envisioned.  Impatient owner, brand new staff, no weapons and then you top it off with a rookie QB?  That's a turd topping on a hot trash sundae right there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...