Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Grant TMJ Permission to Seek Trade


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

TMJ for Jeudy

Sweet baby jesus, when will people stop talking about Jeudy

He's a replacement level player with a $13 million contract next season and is one of the bigger WR divas in the league right now.

Nothing about him is attractive for the Panthers

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

I'm proud of you.

For what?  For putting the same hypothetical trade out there that I've been yelling about for a few weeks now?

That trade with the Bengals and a similar one with the Lions, Burns + Chark for Jameson Williams + 1st + 2nd or 3rd both make a ton of sense for us to make and are pretty fair trades.

The problem with both is that I don't see the other side wanting to do those trades for two different reasons.

The Lions will need to give Hutchinson an extension after next year, not sure they will want to pay both Burns and Hutch big money while trading away Jameson and a First, even if it would give them a better shot at making a run this year.

The Bengals I think would have less of an issue paying Burns, but I don't think they want to get rid of Higgins during the season when he would be key to their SB chances and then can tag and trade him in the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

For what?  For putting the same hypothetical trade out there that I've been yelling about for a few weeks now?

That trade with the Bengals and a similar one with the Lions, Burns + Chark for Jameson Williams + 1st + 2nd or 3rd both make a ton of sense for us to make and are pretty fair trades.

The problem with both is that I don't see the other side wanting to do those trades for two different reasons.

The Lions will need to give Hutchinson an extension after next year, not sure they will want to pay both Burns and Hutch big money while trading away Jameson and a First, even if it would give them a better shot at making a run this year.

The Bengals I think would have less of an issue paying Burns, but I don't think they want to get rid of Higgins during the season when he would be key to their SB chances and then can tag and trade him in the offseason.

You can't take a compliment?

We finally agree on something.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Ornias said:

Agreed. They will take a 7th at this point for him. 

This is Fitterer’s last desperate attempt to get something anything in return and it’s not going to work.

The good teams know Terrace is a project at best and won’t immediately help them

The bad teams that might take a shot at him will prob just wait until he gets cut and pick him up on waivers 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

The Bengals are not parting ways with Higgins lol.

I don't think they trade him either. If Burrow's calf looked like it was going to derail their season, sure. Trade him for top market value. But with Burrow's calf improving I think they'll hang onto Higgins and put their best roster on the field to try to compete for a SB and take the 3rd round comp pick when he walks in FA. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...