-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB. -
Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger. Always has been. And last year was asked to be what he was. Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season. Wasn't even close that year. Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of. The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game. And that was his first investment with XL. My continued point, is the same as going into last season. It's a bad marriage going in. The QB doesn't fit the scheme. Again. Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs. And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going. It's not my preference but that's not my argument. I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it. -
I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut? Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.