Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 1


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

Yup. Another talented Carolina team being wasted by lousy coaching.

And btw - we’re not getting sh🤬t from our bench. Which is slightly more than we’re getting from our team defense.

Part of that is terrible rotations but also bad injury/suspension luck to start the year. Terry, Cody and Miles being added to the lineup should fix the bench issues for the most part. But yeah bench was absolutely atrocious tonight.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, t96 said:

Part of that is terrible rotations but also bad injury/suspension luck to start the year. Terry, Cody and Miles being added to the lineup should fix the bench issues for the most part. But yeah bench was absolutely atrocious tonight.

Look at who's on the bench. Atrocious is what you're going to get when you have maybe 2 nba players on your bench

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, toldozer said:

Look at who's on the bench. Atrocious is what you're going to get when you have maybe 2 nba players on your bench

yeah obviously, and when you're missing 3 key guys you're going to have a thinner bench, that's true of any team. Of course having drafts like 2021 don't help and Kupchak deserves blame for the poor depth, but he's mostly done a great job of getting us young high potential talent across all positions. It's on coaching to make it work.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Clifford is so desperate that he’s got Leaky Black in the game in the first half because everyone else he’s tried has been ass.

Let's be honest, it is time for Clifford to go. For a guy who preaches D, his teams never seem to actually play any. 

His lack of success there proves that the team must not actually listen to anything  he says and just tries to play hero ball. 
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...