Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thielen getting frustrated: "It's an embarrassing effort. I think everyone's just embarrassed."


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quote

"We're just not hitting on all cylinders right now. We're not hitting on any cylinders," Thielen said (via the team's official website). "It's an embarrassing effort. I think everyone's just embarrassed, you know, put up what, six points on offense."

Thielen suggested that it was not fair to the defense, who was playing at a higher level. 

"Like, we didn't do anything. That's embarrassing when your defense is playing the way they're playing, especially the way they're playing. It's embarrassing. 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/panthers-adam-thielen-calls-offensive-struggles-embarrassing-after-failing-to-score-td-in-loss-to-bears/

While he's absolutely correct, he has nothing to be embarrassed about himself. He's practically the only guy on offense who shows up each week.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The next time a WR stops on a route or drops a 3rd down pass, no longer a starter 

find someone on the practice squad or waiver wire 

put number 11 in and run go routes.  Who knows, if Bryce doesn’t get there, they might get pass interference 

Im exceedingly tired of the ‘not hitting on all , not executing’  by Reich 

do your job or you won’t have one   That’s the way it is in The real world 

same goes for the WR coach 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

The next time a WR stops on a route or drops a 3rd down pass, no longer a starter 

Well, part of the issue is that it seems like 75% of our plays have routes specifically designed for the receiver to stop. We have to diversify and get rid of this heavy reliance on hook routes. They’re static routes that defense knows are coming and can just sit on them. I’m not giving the receivers a pass. They are not good. But the coaches aren’t catering to their strengths or putting them in a position to succeed. 
 

We need more crossers, slants, and mesh concepts where the natural actions of the routes help the receivers create separation. We’ll be limited in the depth we can throw them because we can’t trust the offensive line to hold up and that will mean things are still difficult, but better route combinations would go a long way toward boosting the offense. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, woahfraze said:

Well, part of the issue is that it seems like 75% of our plays have routes specifically designed for the receiver to stop. We have to diversify and get rid of this heavy reliance on hook routes. They’re static routes that defense knows are coming and can just sit on them. I’m not giving the receivers a pass. They are not good. But the coaches aren’t catering to their strengths or putting them in a position to succeed. 
 

We need more crossers, slants, and mesh concepts where the natural actions of the routes help the receivers create separation. We’ll be limited in the depth we can throw them because we can’t trust the offensive line to hold up and that will mean things are still difficult, but better route combinations would go a long way toward boosting the offense. 

Part of being a receiver is knowing to come back to the quarterback when he is in trouble.  They do not do that 

and the stopping of routes I’m talking about are the few routes that are over 20 yards 

how many times have you seen Mingo stop on those.  

yes schematically atrocious but that does not excuse not making a play when it’s there to be made 

these are paid professional, not high school 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Part of being a receiver is knowing to come back to the quarterback when he is in trouble.  They do not do that 

and the routes I’m talking g about or the few routes that are over 20 yards 

how many times have you seen Mingo stop in those.  

Mingo needs to go to the bench.  Can’t believe Thomas Brown said Mingo is too good give ISM a rep.  Mingo has run some horrific routes this year.  The type that should  get him yanked out of a game. 
 

 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dorian Gray said:

It’s mind blowing to watch a replay of Young scrambling out and most of the receivers are standing around. Are they not allowed to move from a certain spot?

Yes

im like, what exactly is Van Jefferson expecting of these guys.  What are they doing in practice every damned day 

honest to god, I can find no more rationale or any acceptable excuses of what is being trotted out there every day that we are expected to pay to see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mingo was similar to Brown and DK coming out where they were giants with limited route running ability who were going to take time to develop. 

I don't remember how Tennessee used Brown but in Seattle then just sent DK on go routes and let him body up on WRs. He's developed since his rookie year, but they knew what he could do and couldn't do when they got him. 

Panthers have hit one go route all year (underthrown pass to Thielen against Houston) and Bryce has thrown maybe 4? 

It's just more of the same disconnect between every single player the team has and the plays they're calling for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mingo and TMJ both look just absolutely dreadful for high 2nd round picks.

We could have had a pro-bowl center and a solid young TE like Musgrave or La Porta (4th we wasted for Johnson jumps 38 to 33) or a bevy of fast WRs.

Again, Fitt has been just awful and I think we can no longer just blame Rhule since Fitterer is doing the same poo now as he did with prior drafts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...