Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns NFL’s top 2024 Free Agent


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Tee Higgins is not helping this team win games.

 

Justin Jefferson is not helping this team win games.

 

We have a lot of holes to fill on this team no 1 single player is helping us win games. We need to start keeping our good players instead of trading them for picks that turn out to be nothing.

 

 

Brian Burns isn't helping this team win games either. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Tee Higgins is not helping this team win games.

 

Justin Jefferson is not helping this team win games.

 

We have a lot of holes to fill on this team no 1 single player is helping us win games. We need to start keeping our good players instead of trading them for picks that turn out to be nothing.

 

 

I hear you and agree in most cases. But a WR that can take the top of the defense and win contested passes can definitely change the way defenses play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

In FA you're probably right. What will likely happens is they franchise tag him and then trade him for value.

 

That's when he becomes more realistic.

 

 

If they let him become a FA then yeah no way he comes here. He can go to Houston a better market and a better QB to play with Stroud.

LOL

You literally just posted like 2 days ago that Higgins needed to be our top FA priority, I then quoted you and pointed out that he's not going to hit FA.

You're welcome

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont get the Burns hate. Yes he's a 1 trick. But its a hell of a trick. If hes rated the number 1 free agent in the league top 5 pass rusher at his position who else on the Panthers roster is top 5 of anything????? Yes you could get a first or optimally 2 first for him, but 1 of those picks at the least has to go to replacing him because did you see us on Thursday...

Our pass rush without him was nonexistent.. it was awful.. 0 pressure or even hope for pressure.. Having him doesnt help bryce but Its a luxury of having an elite blitzer that you have to have...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I dont get the Burns hate. Yes he's a 1 trick. But its a hell of a trick. If hes rated the number 1 free agent in the league top 5 pass rusher at his position who else on the Panthers roster is top 5 of anything????? Yes you could get a first or optimally 2 first for him, but 1 of those picks at the least has to go to replacing him because did you see us on Thursday...

Our pass rush without him was nonexistent.. it was awful.. 0 pressure or even hope for pressure.. Having him doesnt help bryce but Its a luxury of having an elite blitzer that you have to have...

When your offense can't put up more than 6 points against one of the worst defenses in the NFL, paying a 30m a year edge rusher that's a liability against the run is a luxury you really can't afford. We need to tear this team down and build it from the top. But that isn't going to happen. We're going to keep losing. Year after year, season after season, until the only fans left in the stands are all from opposing teams. Tepper is the worst thing to ever happen to this franchise and he will continue to destroy it and make it an even bigger laughing stock.

Pay Burns, don't pay him. It doesn't matter. If this team doesn't make some serious changes starting with the 2 cosplaying owners, I doubt they win 40 games in the next decade. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...