Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chark questioning the call


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mage said:

Bro is talking like he was about to make a play.

Bro is talking like it was a bullshit call and he didn’t appreciate his head coach blaming him for not doing something right.  If the call is 4 yards behind….Chark was exactly that if you rewatch the play.  Odd that Chark felt the need to bring up the exact depth he was supposed to be.  Word traveled fast Frank was throwing folks under the bus. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest the right call was probably a timeout. It was a zero blitz. And given our offensive line, there was probably 0 chance to get a play off. A screen works if executed. It was not. 
 

You can blame Frank for not having better answers dialed up. 
You can blame the players for not executing. 
 

By all accounts it appears that Bryce got them in the right play and the offense failed to execute it.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CRA said:

Bro is talking like it was a bullshit call and he didn’t appreciate his head coach blaming him for not doing something right.  If the call is 4 yards behind….Chark was exactly that if you rewatch the play.  Odd that Chark felt the need to bring up the exact depth he was supposed to be.  Word traveled fast Frank was throwing folks under the bus. 

Because Young can't be that dude.  Everyone saw the audible watching the game, EVERYONE.  So in order for Bryce not to take the blame, gotta divert elsewhere.  Yeah, he'll stand at the podium as say "that's on me" which is getting old quickly, but notice neither the staff nor players have criticized him to date.  So if Chark is the guy to fall on the sword for the failed 4th down, then that's just the way it has to be.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Because Young can't be that dude.  Everyone saw the audible, EVERYONE.  So in order for Bryce not to take the blame, gotta divert elsewhere.  Yeah, he'll stand at the podium as say "that's on me" which is getting old quickly, but notice the staff neither the staff nor players have criticized him.  So if Chark is the guy to fall on the sword for the failed 4th down, then that's just the way it has to be.

Well, Chark wasn’t about that life.  And I don’t blame him.  Frank up there today channeling Matt Rhule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Because Young can't be that dude.  Everyone saw the audible watching the game, EVERYONE.  So in order for Bryce not to take the blame, gotta divert elsewhere.  Yeah, he'll stand at the podium as say "that's on me" which is getting old quickly, but notice neither the staff nor players have criticized him to date.  So if Chark is the guy to fall on the sword for the failed 4th down, then that's just the way it has to be.

So you think Bryce called the play out of his ass? That’s not how an offense works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...