Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CFB conference championship games

LinvilleGorge

By LinvilleGorge,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

FSU would have been in if they didn't lose their starting QB.

 

How is that hard to understand?

So again, why play the season? If being undefeated and winning your conference championship does not make you good enough, fug the season. You've basically admitted it's an eye test by saying they are no longer good enough, although they were good enough to beat everyone on their schedule. 

3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Then people will complain they should have never made it to begin with.

And those people would be wrong.

So, by your own hypothetical, if Mahomes gets hurt tonight and can't finish the season, the Chiefs are out of the playoffs, right? Fug their record, they're no longer the "best?"

Perhaps defining what "best" is would be nice. Because if winning every fugging game you play doesn't make you one of the best, I'm not sure what does. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

So again, why play the season? If being undefeated and winning your conference championship does not make you good enough, fug the season. You've basically admitted it's an eye test by saying they are no longer good enough, although they were good enough to beat everyone on their schedule. 

And those people would be wrong.

So, by your own hypothetical, if Mahomes gets hurt tonight and can't finish the season, the Chiefs are out of the playoffs, right? Fug their record, they're no longer the "best?"

Perhaps defining what "best" is would be nice. Because if winning every fugging game you play doesn't make you one of the best, I'm not sure what does. 

NCAA and NFL are entirely different leagues. If you fail to understand that, then you just have a problem with the NCAA and the way they run things.

 

Guys it's over, time to move on. Discussing what if's is just wasting time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

NCAA and NFL are entirely different leagues. If you fail to understand that, then you just have a problem with the NCAA and the way they run things.

 

Guys it's over, time to move on. Discussing what if's is just wasting time.

So you bring up Mahomes as an example and then decide to invalidate your own example and bail out with the NFL and NCAA being different.

No sh1t Sherlock.

And yes, the Committee has a credibility problem. They brought it on themselves.

Edited by Anybodyhome
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

So you bring up Mahomes as an example and then decide to invalidate your own example and bail out with the NFL and NCAA being different.

No sh1t Sherlock.

And yes, the Committee has a credibility problem. They brought it on themselves.

Cry me a river.

 

Life isn't fair oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
  • Author
Posted
23 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

Your take here is bad @kungfoodude  Have at 'em for being (most likely trash NFL QBs as we'll probably never truly know), but both of them like The Golden Calf of Bristol were very good college QBs.  Hell, both Fromm and Bennett could throw the damn ball better than the calf.

This. If we're having an NFL conversation they weren't great prospects. Hell, I don't think anyone really tried to argue otherwise. But if we're having a college conversation they were damn good college QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

FSU likely isn’t one of the top 4 best teams.  But you had to put them in.  You simply can’t exclude an undefeated power 5 team for a bunch of 1 loss teams.   That is the committee imploring too much subjectivity….and in a year where the other power 5 conferences weren’t even that great vs prior years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...