Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB EPA (expected pts added) vs OL pass-block grades for recent years - Purdy at the top, Bryce at the bottom


KSpan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Interesting snippet charting a QB's individual EPA vs the OL pass-block grades, basically trying to show who may be contributing relative to their OL play. Since Brock Purdy gets brought up frequently around here, he has the highest EPA even with SF's terrible OL blocking grades. At the very bottom of EPA and also with abysmal OL grades? Bryce, Zach Wilson (2023), Mac Jones (2021), Kenny Pickett (2023), Sam Darnold (2021), and others.

There are many other factors to consider in the overall, but it is interesting to see what QBs have also been suffering from dumpster-level pass blocking and their respective EPAs.

Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Only folks who don't watch the games and consider PFF to be the Holy Bible think that SF has a bottom five OL. 

No real disagreement, but FWIW Purdy's pressure rate is 22% with 2.6s pocket time while Bryce's, since this is a Panthers board, is 23.9% with 2.5s pocket time. Stroud is right behind him at 2.5s and 23.6% and Levis 2.5% but 26.9% pressure.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2023/passing_advanced.htm

Stats don't tell a whoel story of any kind but it is interesting to look at and see correlations between pocket time, pressure, sack rates, and who the outliers are.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's all fine and dandy, but it helps when you have probably the best offensive mind in football as your coach and have the best weapons to throw to in the NFL... That might have an impact on why he is playing so well...

I'm also not buying San Fran having a bottom five pass blocking oline. PFF loved to give Brian Burns an 80+ PFF grade every week for a while, despite having like one tackle in the game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Brock Purdy thing is so funny to me.  The whole argument about how he's only successful because of the rest of the team, and anybody could do it.  Okay, so why didn't Trey Lance work?  Why did they kick Jimmy G to the curb?

Obviously he's not the best athlete in the NFL, but he's clearly doing something right.  It tickles me because there's a big cross section of people that believe this but don't think a better supporting cast would save Bryce.

Brock Purdy is getting help from the fact that he's on a good team with a good coach, but he's clearly doing something right.  I don't think you could just put any QB in that situation and they would have the same success.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

No real disagreement, but FWIW Purdy's pressure rate is 22% with 2.6s pocket time while Bryce's, since this is a Panthers board, is 23.9% with 2.5s pocket time. Stroud is right behind him at 2.5s and 23.6% and Levis 2.5% but 26.9% pressure.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2023/passing_advanced.htm

Stats don't tell a whoel story of any kind but it is interesting to look at and see correlations between pocket time, pressure, sack rates, and who the outliers are.

People keep trying to do mental gymnastics but the reality is that a lot of our offensive struggles boil down to Bryce sucks.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

People keep trying to do mental gymnastics but the reality is that a lot of our offensive struggles boil down to Bryce sucks.

Our rookie #1 pick QB has sucked this year but the team also sucked at surrounding him with proper players + coaching. Both are pretty much true I don't really know how you can argue against the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When creating metrics like "average time to pass," there is a bit of context that is needed.  Some QBs hold the ball too long, but their average time to throw gets lowered because of a high number of quick screen type passes.  

My biggest knock on Bryce is that he holds the ball too long.  He turns down throws that are in the natural structure of the play in favor of running around and "making something happen."  That playing style is always going to make an offensive line look worse than it is.  And mixing in a bunch of called quick screens will bring down the average time to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The Brock Purdy thing is so funny to me.  The whole argument about how he's only successful because of the rest of the team, and anybody could do it.  Okay, so why didn't Trey Lance work?  Why did they kick Jimmy G to the curb?

Obviously he's not the best athlete in the NFL, but he's clearly doing something right.  It tickles me because there's a big cross section of people that believe this but don't think a better supporting cast would save Bryce.

Brock Purdy is getting help from the fact that he's on a good team with a good coach, but he's clearly doing something right.  I don't think you could just put any QB in that situation and they would have the same success.

The people who think this about Purdy have clearly forgotten that Sam Darnold is on that team as the backup.  There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Darnold is the more physically gifted QB of the two.  The thing is West Coast systems never valued big arms.  They value intelligence, decisiveness and timing.  These are things Purdy has in spades.

Purdy isn't a system QB, he's a QB that fits the system.  He's Teddy Bridgewater with enough arm to hit the downfield shots that a WC system opens up with it's stretch concepts.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The Brock Purdy thing is so funny to me.  The whole argument about how he's only successful because of the rest of the team, and anybody could do it.  Okay, so why didn't Trey Lance work?  Why did they kick Jimmy G to the curb?

Obviously he's not the best athlete in the NFL, but he's clearly doing something right.  It tickles me because there's a big cross section of people that believe this but don't think a better supporting cast would save Bryce.

Brock Purdy is getting help from the fact that he's on a good team with a good coach, but he's clearly doing something right.  I don't think you could just put any QB in that situation and they would have the same success.

Because Lance and Jimmy G flat out suck. No one is saying Purdy sucks. He's just in an ideal situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
    • I dont know. He seems like a bigger douche now than ever. I didnt hate him for being a great player.
×
×
  • Create New...