Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Coach/GM Updates


ProcessBlue2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

I hope we get somebody good but for all the reasons mentioned somewhere in the thread we probably are not.

Fans keep asking why do these guys take the interview if they are not interested. If you are in the corporate world you know exactly why, it is a negotiating tool, it drives up your price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Right bc why wouldn’t you want to at least try and interview one of the best coaches in football? 

Because you want to remain the Alpha…the real Alpha would rip someone up…the fake Alpha would throw a drink. 

Edited by KBRed
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schuyler Callahan per Hondo (Raiders beat writer) thinks we're making a strong push for Champ Kelly as GM. Callahan thinks Brandt Tillis may be the guy. If you want to hear, here's the link (start at about 28:40):

https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/gm-report/podcast-panthers-gm-search-picking-up-steam

 

In other news, Graziano predicts Brian Callahan to be the guy at HC.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2024/01/17/espn-insider-prediction-panthers-hc-search-brian-callahan-joe-burrow-bryce-young/

The article mentioned that it's difficult to predict the HC due to the (Tepper) situation.

I'd be remiss not to mention that Morgan seems to be high on the list for GM. There are thoughts that Tepper wants to keep him in some capacity.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Right bc why wouldn’t you want to at least try and interview one of the best coaches in football? 

Well the premise that I responded to was “if he doesn’t want the job”…so that would be the reason. You’d just be interviewing him for appearances, which is a waste of everybody’s time. Also you really have no idea if the team has reached out to Harbaugh because he’s not an NFL coach and it wouldn’t be reported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Well the premise that I responded to was “if he doesn’t want the job”…so that would be the reason. You’d just be interviewing him for appearances, which is a waste of everybody’s time. Also you really have no idea if the team has reached out to Harbaugh because he’s not an NFL coach and it wouldn’t be reported.

You’re absolutely right, that’s why I’m going with we should interview him. Until I read or hear that he said no or we don’t want any part of him, I will go with my statement of we should at least try. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Well the premise that I responded to was “if he doesn’t want the job”…so that would be the reason. You’d just be interviewing him for appearances, which is a waste of everybody’s time. Also you really have no idea if the team has reached out to Harbaugh because he’s not an NFL coach and it wouldn’t be reported.

It's been reported that harbaugh has asked twice about the Panthers. He clearly wants the job

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

It's been reported that harbaugh has asked twice about the Panthers. He clearly wants the job

i could see it possible that we have reached out and he’s not answering. if it’s true that he has reached out to us, and we’re not answering, then i’m fully on board the Tepper is an idiot wagon.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Schuyler Callahan per Hondo (Raiders beat writer) thinks we're making a strong push for Champ Kelly as GM. Callahan thinks Brandt Tillis may be the guy. If you want to hear, here's the link (start at about 28:40):

https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/gm-report/podcast-panthers-gm-search-picking-up-steam

 

In other news, Graziano predicts Brian Callahan to be the guy at HC.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2024/01/17/espn-insider-prediction-panthers-hc-search-brian-callahan-joe-burrow-bryce-young/

The article mentioned that it's difficult to predict the HC due to the (Tepper) situation.

I'd be remiss not to mention that Morgan seems to be high on the list for GM. There are thoughts that Tepper wants to keep him in some capacity.

From the writer...

If that's true, damn 😳

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

i could see it possible that we have reached out and he’s not answering. if it’s true that he has reached out to us, and we’re not answering, then i’m fully on board the Tepper is an idiot wagon.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/jim-harbaugh-nfl-rumors-michigan-coach-talked-with-panthers-but-owner-david-tepper-didnt-initiate-call/

That was last year and they reported that he still is interested in being here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...