Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With Panthers cleaning house how safe is Bryce


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For at least next year, very.

I think it could be very possible hes moved now, if a new GM is convinced he's not the guy, while his value still might be sort of high. 
 I am worried they ONLY hire someone who is convinced he is the guy though. 
 

 

Edited by Frank9999
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

GM is out and staff. Bryce will not be the next GMs pick. You think it’s possible he is moved for draft capital ? I just think people should accept this possibility since he’s now the old regimes guy. 

He's not a lock on being the game one starter but he'll definitely be the #1 QB going into camp.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Safe 

In terms of being on the roster next year. But in terms of being the long term starter? Definitely not safe.

The next gm and coach are extremely likely to bring in some qb competition for Bryce and make him earn his job. Whether that be a mid to late round drafted qb or a vet qb.

So maybe Bryce starts the year out, but if he's still performing like he did this year halfway through 2024?? He could be benched.

 

 

Edited by Hoenheim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not very safe in the big picture. 

New HCs largely want their own QB.  That fits their own vision.  That starts a new time clock.  Young is inherited from someone else's mess.  So the changes are bad news for him and his career overall. 

and you judge Bryce down the stretch.  We failed to score a TD in 4 of the last 5 games.  Shutout in the last 2.  Bryce got worse.  And Bryce has a lot of independent issues from the rest of the issues.  A new HC is going to have to arm this team with QB options even if Bryce is defaulted into the 1 to start it off. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will wait to see who the new GM is. If it’s someone like Dan Morgan he’s more safe than he should be. The right answer is he’s the starter going into next season but should be evaluated critically with consideration towards moving on if there’s a repeat of this year and not much growth is shown.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...