Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview requests

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Evil Hurney Mentor

Evil Hurney

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Nah at the least you take the interview if you’re Johnson so you can take the $ offer to another team 

Tepper already leaked that $15M a year story to get the poorer owners like Spanos and Davis out of the Johnson race.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bdog505 Newbie

bdog505

Posted
Posted

This may have been mention already. We are going  to hire people who are going  to have to accept that their resume has possible 25 or more loses over the next two years. Tough selliig pint for your future.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Veteran

Mage

Posted
Posted

I know nothing about the likelihood of the GM candidates working out, but if I was going to back anyone it would be Alec Halaby.  Philadelphia has routinely been one of the most talented teams in the NFL and one of the best at wheeling and dealing.  I'd bet he's learned a thing or two there.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Community Regular

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, Mage said:

I know nothing about the likelihood of the GM candidates working out, but if I was going to back anyone it would be Alec Halaby.  Philadelphia has routinely been one of the most talented teams in the NFL and one of the best at wheeling and dealing.  I'd bet he's learned a thing or two there.  

Yeah I like Halaby, Dodds, and Kelly. Tills is okay. The rest can kick rocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted

It's impossible to know what role behind the scenes each of these GM candidates have within their organizations.    Sure, you may know their job title and their initial backgrounds but it's hard to have any well informed option on how they impact their current team.

I think we have a pretty good list with a variety of thought processes.  

 Only name I wanted was Peters but it seems that they aren't wasting their time with him, he seems to be a lock to Washington (from media rumors).

 

But hey, we all wanted Fitterer gone and we got our wish.  We can have hope until proven otherwise that the new GM will be better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

It's impossible to know what role behind the scenes each of these GM candidates have within their organizations.    Sure, you may know their job title and their initial backgrounds but it's hard to have any well informed option on how they impact their current team.

I think we have a pretty good list with a variety of thought processes.  

 Only name I wanted was Peters but it seems that they aren't wasting their time with him, he seems to be a lock to Washington (from media rumors).

 

But hey, we all wanted Fitterer gone and we got our wish.  We can have hope until proven otherwise that the new GM will be better.  

Solid points and it’s why I’m a bit less invested this time around in the GM search. Sure we can string together a work history, assume who’s on their Rolodex, find some articles and watch interviews but there’s so many layers to it..difficult to form a well-informed opinion as a fan/outside looking in.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted
Just now, Bear Hands said:

Solid points and it’s why I’m a bit less invested this time around in the GM search. Sure we can string together a work history, assume who’s on their Rolodex, find some articles and watch interviews but there’s so many layers to it..difficult to form a well-informed opinion as a fan/outside looking in.

 

It's tough because everybody is just clamoring for a sign of hope.

I'm excited because why not.  It appears that the search firm is doing their thing and Tepper has learned some.

And until we hear news about candidates rejecting us , it appears that everybody's worse case scenario is not coming true.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

the thing about the search firm is...who is putting in the parameters for what we're looking for at HC and GM? 

Does tepper still have in his head what he wants and sticking to his guns or does he have someone advising him on what he should be looking for?

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

the thing about the search firm is...who is putting in the parameters for what we're looking for at HC and GM? 

Does tepper still have in his head what he wants and sticking to his guns or does he have someone advising him on what he should be looking for?

That's another thing we won't know.

But can at least be thankful one is involved at all.  From the outside, it at least appears to be the correct step to fixing our process.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rayzor said:

the thing about the search firm is...who is putting in the parameters for what we're looking for at HC and GM? 

Does tepper still have in his head what he wants and sticking to his guns or does he have someone advising him on what he should be looking for?

From what is rumored it seems Dave is listening to too many people. He's collecting data like Google and doing what with it is yet to reveal itself.  The only thing we can do is sit back and see what old mastermind comes up with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Solid points and it’s why I’m a bit less invested this time around in the GM search. Sure we can string together a work history, assume who’s on their Rolodex, find some articles and watch interviews but there’s so many layers to it..difficult to form a well-informed opinion as a fan/outside looking in.

i'm just along for the ride at this point for GM and HC. 

i really have no bandwagon i'm jumping on. i've got no dog in this fight. whatever happens, happens.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Every Big-Time Throw from Bryce Young and CJ Stroud in 2023

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I interpreted your original reply as the team could have success if the new players and coaches were really good, AND they created an offense that didn't count on the QB being a primary contributor. Because you think Bryce won't be able to hold up his end. I think you confirm that above. My only point is that I don't see how anyone can say definitively what Bryce Young will be in the league yet, based on his supporting cast from last season. And it seems those that have already decided that Bryce Young is a bust, likely just didn't like him as the pick in the first place. A little context for me... lots of folk here didn't like Cam while he was a Panther either. It had very little to do with him as a talent. And just for the record, I really am not invested in Bryce Young. I didn't want the team to move up for a QB at all in 2023. I thought 2024 would be the year to go for a QB. But when they did, I ordered the QBs as Anthony Richardson, then CJ, then Bryce. The disfunction from the front office, to the playcalling, to the scheme, to the oline and the receivers was just not a good situation. Horrible actually. Asking a rookie to perform with all that adversity is just not realistic to me, at any position let alone QB. So to me, the verdict is still out. I don't know if he can be the guy because the situation he was in last year was set up to fail from the start. In preseason, as soon as I saw the oline couldn't figure out how to even slow down the Jets' pass rush (particularly stunts) and the receivers were locked up like Fort Knox, I knew we were in for a long season. 
    • strato
      Does the Canales era have a new vibe?

      By strato · Posted

      I bet one would. But I hear you and hope he can control himself.
    • TD alt
      Does the Canales era have a new vibe?

      By TD alt · Posted

      It's a different vibe for sure. He sounds like he knows what he's talking about and his general plan---that which he tells the world---sounds like a working plan. Reich didn't seem to have a plan, and Rhule's plan was ill-suited for grown men. Reich coached like a zombie---just dead and uninspiring. Rhule thought that he could take his college guys and dominate in the pros, smiled in guys faces and threw them under the bus. His brand of motivation has plays running to a DBO sign. Canales seems to be schooled in motivation, but also believes the stuff he is selling down to his core. We'll see if it holds up.    
×
×
  • Create New...