Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Commanders want Ben Johnson


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

He’s keeping them here because they are good coordinators but if the new coach wants to dismiss them so be it but I’m gonna hold onto them in case they want them. It’s a sign that the head coach and offense were the problem.

They already blocked 2 interviews on a maybe? It's obvious he is hoping to keep them here. Everything was a problem, some more than others. Some of those guys also went behind the last HC's back. Tepper still thinks he built an allstar staff but in the end they were all a 2 win staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

He bowed out when he realised the GM was just going to be Rhule's bag boy.

And yet he took the DC job. That was part of the point I was trying to make why it's looking like the better landing spot than the Panthers. They get Petters and we will get another Fritters or worse, the analytical genius that Tepper thinks will save him by cracking the code where football is just an equation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Waldo said:

They already blocked 2 interviews on a maybe? It's obvious he is hoping to keep them here. Everything was a problem, some more than others. Some of those guys also went behind the last HC's back. Tepper still thinks he built an allstar staff but in the end they were all a 2 win staff. 

Just because the Huddle thinks they are bad doesn't mean the league thinks they are bad. WE have something other teams in worse situations on defense and ST want.  Not everything boils down to Tepper Bad.  Some moves actually make sense, if the new HC has a plan then neither of them are gonna hurt for a job next season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Steelo said:

Just because the Huddle thinks they are bad doesn't mean the league thinks they are bad. WE have something other teams in worse situations on defense and ST want.  Not everything boils down to Tepper Bad.  Some moves actually make sense, if the new HC has a plan then neither of them are gonna hurt for a job next season.

2 wins. Can the guys here do better? Absolutely. Dropping a new HC in like they dropped in Bryce and expecting the best outcome is going to be hilarious because it's a terrible idea. These moves don't make sense because keeping anyone after the stuff, all of it, that went down this season is a bad idea. It was a poorly built staff that already turned on itself and then failed doing it their way. It's like expecting better talent acquisition when Tepper gets his analytical GM to match with this dropped in HC. Change is healthy in these situations and not burning bridges would be a huge positive, for players and staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

2 wins. Can the guys here do better? Absolutely. Dropping a new HC in like they dropped in Bryce and expecting the best outcome is going to be hilarious because it's a terrible idea. These moves don't make sense because keeping anyone after the stuff, all of it, that went down this season is a bad idea. It was a poorly built staff that already turned on itself and then failed doing it their way. It's like expecting better talent acquisition when Tepper gets his analytical GM to match with this dropped in HC. Change is healthy in these situations and not burning bridges would be a huge positive, for players and staff.

I get that point.  I still like to let the next HC decide the fate of the staff we currently have under contract.  If they clean house, they clean house and rightfully so.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...