Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or GoogleĀ accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account.Ā 

    Members receive fewer adsĀ , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

    Ā 

Cam on Dan LeBatard


ComebackCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I don't give a fug what anybody says, I would STILL take Cam back with open arms right now. Miss that dude so damn much. He brought an energy to Charlotte that will never be replicated.

Yeah I’d be happy to watch us go 6-10 while Cam tries to spam his way to the all time rush TD record lol. Prob wouldn’t get there but it would be fun.Ā 
Ā 

I sort of wished we just played Armanti Edward’s in 2010, even if it sucked he would have been funĀ 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Donald LaFell said:

Yeah I’d be happy to watch us go 6-10 while Cam tries to spam his way to the all time rush TD record lol. Prob wouldn’t get there but it would be fun.Ā 
Ā 

I sort of wished we just played Armanti Edward’s in 2010, even if it sucked he would have been funĀ 

That's all I want these days. The last "fun" thing that happened to this franchise since Tepper took over was, unironically, Cam coming back for those few weeks. This franchise has been a depressing sh*t show for damn near a decade now. If we're going to watch a noddle arm QB next season anyway, I'd rather watch the GOAT Panther do it. At least you'll know that sh*t would be entertaining!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

He said Kaep

The absolute cognitive dissonance the sports media has with Cam infuriates me to no end. Absolutely embarassing to even mention Kaep when Cam Newton's on the field successĀ has shown so much more than he ever had.

The same sports media that claims Cam Newton isn't a pocket passer - despite a large majority of his snaps being in the pocket! - and then sayingĀ bullpoo like this.

Cam created a new paradigm on defense that accounted for running QBs, and was an absolute beast in every way.Ā 

Shame on the media for bringing down one of the most polarizing and talented QBs of this generation.

Ā 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I don't give a fug what anybody says, I would STILL take Cam back with open arms right now. Miss that dude so damn much. He brought an energy to Charlotte that will never be replicated.

Hell no we ruined Cam.

Ā 

Dream scenario he ends up in Atlanta as a backup. Starting QB goes down at the end of the season and Cam comes in and lead them to a SB run. He retires with his SB in his hometown.

Ā 

I'm here for it!

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

But at the same time, I look at if I had certain personnel alongside of me while I was playing.............man that would have been nice

Damn, that one quote from Cam hit me in the feels. FUG you Gettleman and Hurney. Imagine Cam if he EVER had weapons like Tua has, or Dak has, or Purdy has. Instead we drafted huge receivers that couldn't run routes.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Hell no we ruined Cam.

Ā 

Dream scenario he ends up in Atlanta as a backup. Starting QB goes down at the end of the season and Cam comes in and lead them to a SB run. He retires with his SB in his hometown.

Ā 

I'm here for it!

We really did man. Protecting him with the likes of Byron Bell and Nate Chandler 🤢, drafting him slow ass receivers, pairing him with dumbass Shula, etc. We wasted such a generational talent. In a way, it's kind of poetic that we missed on Stroud, because we would have just ruined him like we did Cam.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Damn, that one quote from Cam hit me in the feels. FUG you Gettleman and Hurney. Imagine Cam if he EVER had weapons like Tua has, or Dak has, or Purdy has. Instead we drafted huge receivers that couldn't run routes.

It wouldve been awesome if Cam got forceful with the GMs he had and Rivera and told them to get him some fuging weapons and help on the line. I wouldnt have blamed him if he forced himself out of this dumbass organization. But thats not in his nature and I understand how frustrating that is.

Edited by KillerKat
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

We really did man. Protecting him with the likes of Byron Bell and Nate Chandler 🤢, drafting him slow ass receivers, pairing him with dumbass Shula, etc. We wasted such a generational talent. In a way, it's kind of poetic that we missed on Stroud, because we would have just ruined him like we did Cam.

Yep. This is why I say F**k Rivera. Terrible coach.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out.Ā Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.Ā  Ā 
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive. Ā I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...