Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Harbaugh to Chargers


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, top dawg said:

He had a hard-on for Herbert anyway. No surprise.

Chargers probably have the best situation qb wise, so if Harbaugh has his choice of places to go, the Chargers are the best spot.  They do have some cap and contract issues from what I read, but having the right qb in place allows him to focus on other things.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are seemingly at least 2x more major candidates for HC jobs than there are jobs available which should make things interesting in the coming days.

 

1. Panthers 

2. Falcons

3. Commanders

4. Seahawks 

5. Raiders (Hired Antonio Pierce)  

6. Patriots  (Hired Jarod Mayo) 

7. Titans ( Hired Brian Callahan) 

8. Chargers (Hired John Harbaugh)

 

Major HC Prospects Left

1. Ben Johnson (OC Lions) 

2. Bobby Slowik (OC Texans) 

3. Bill Belichick (Former HC Patriots) 

4. Pete Caroll (Former HC Seahawks) 

5. Mike Vrabel (Former HC Titans) 

6.  Mike Macdonald (DC Ravens) 

7. Ejiro Evero (DC Panthers) 

8. Frank Smith (OC Dolphins) 

9. Dan Quinn (DC Cowboys) 

And you could of course add Canales to that list for the Panthers specifically.

 

Edited by Hoenheim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I get that he has had success, but I never wanted him. He seems like an odd guy to me personality wise. 

You'd rather win 2 games with someone you can grab a beer with after work than have perennial success with someone you find 'odd'? Someone you don't even know personally? Am I reading this right

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

You'd rather win 2 games with someone you can grab a beer with after work than have perennial success with someone you find 'odd'? Someone you don't even know personally? Am I reading this right

No you are not. That’s called projection my friend. I’d rather win….i don’t care if it is Stephen Hawking running the team, I’m  just saying I have a bad feeling about him coming back leading men on an NFL team with his personality. He will prob win games in LA (he has a top 5 QB) but in my opinion he would have zero chance here. That personality only works in certain circumstances, and you cannot deny that the reports weren’t glowing when he left the NFL originally. Yes he had a winning record on loaded teams, but he was 8-8 in his last season and bounced out (any time there is adversity he seems to leave immediately.)

He has a track record of moving on pretty quick and does not have glowing relationships with teams he has worked for in the past. Again I’m not debating his ability to win games on talented teams, I’m just saying I fell like he would have been a disaster playing for certain NFL teams….us included. He always seems to have one foot out the door, even Michigan got tired of him talking to NFL teams every off season and he would say the complete opposite when ask about his NFL interest. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...